Effect of Post-stroke Depression on Functional Outcomes of Patients With Stroke in the Rehabilitation Ward: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Yoshitaka Wada MD, PhD , Yohei Otaka MD, PhD , Taiki Yoshida OTR, PhD , Kanako Takekoshi RN , Raku Takenaka MD , Yuki Senju MD, PhD , Hirofumi Maeda MD, PhD , Seiko Shibata MD, PhD , Taro Kishi MD, PhD , Satoshi Hirano MD, PhD
{"title":"Effect of Post-stroke Depression on Functional Outcomes of Patients With Stroke in the Rehabilitation Ward: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Yoshitaka Wada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yohei Otaka MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Taiki Yoshida OTR, PhD ,&nbsp;Kanako Takekoshi RN ,&nbsp;Raku Takenaka MD ,&nbsp;Yuki Senju MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Maeda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Seiko Shibata MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Taro Kishi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Satoshi Hirano MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the prevalence of post-stroke depression in a rehabilitation ward and elucidate its effect on functional improvement and outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A convalescent rehabilitation ward at a University Hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 114 patients with stroke (mean [SD] age, 67.2 [13.5] years; men, 76) assessed at 2 weeks after admission using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview were enrolled.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure</h3><p>Functional independence measure (FIM) efficiency during hospitalization in the ward.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eleven patients (9.6%) had depression based on the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Total FIM efficiency and FIM efficiency in the subtotal of motor items were significantly higher in the non-depression group than in the depression group (median [interquartile range]: 0.69 [0.39-0.95] vs 0.41 [0.24-0.63], <em>P</em>=.027; and 0.56 [0.38-0.80] vs 0.42 [0.18-0.49], <em>P</em>=.023, respectively). Patients in the non-depression group had higher FIM scores at discharge (median [interquartile range]: 116.0 [104.5-123.0] vs 104.0 [82.5-112.0], <em>P</em>=.013, respectively), and were more likely to be discharged home (80.6% vs 36.4%, <em>P</em>=.003). Furthermore, patients in the depression group also stayed significantly longer in the ward (71.0 [36.1] vs 106.1 [43.3], <em>P</em>=.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with post-stroke depression showed poorer efficiency of functional recovery than those without depression. A future multicenter study with a larger sample size is needed to verify these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000435/pdfft?md5=ccc69e29e3536f322048fe7bcd204db7&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000435-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the prevalence of post-stroke depression in a rehabilitation ward and elucidate its effect on functional improvement and outcomes.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

A convalescent rehabilitation ward at a University Hospital.

Participants

A total of 114 patients with stroke (mean [SD] age, 67.2 [13.5] years; men, 76) assessed at 2 weeks after admission using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview were enrolled.

Main Outcome Measure

Functional independence measure (FIM) efficiency during hospitalization in the ward.

Results

Eleven patients (9.6%) had depression based on the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Total FIM efficiency and FIM efficiency in the subtotal of motor items were significantly higher in the non-depression group than in the depression group (median [interquartile range]: 0.69 [0.39-0.95] vs 0.41 [0.24-0.63], P=.027; and 0.56 [0.38-0.80] vs 0.42 [0.18-0.49], P=.023, respectively). Patients in the non-depression group had higher FIM scores at discharge (median [interquartile range]: 116.0 [104.5-123.0] vs 104.0 [82.5-112.0], P=.013, respectively), and were more likely to be discharged home (80.6% vs 36.4%, P=.003). Furthermore, patients in the depression group also stayed significantly longer in the ward (71.0 [36.1] vs 106.1 [43.3], P=.010).

Conclusions

Patients with post-stroke depression showed poorer efficiency of functional recovery than those without depression. A future multicenter study with a larger sample size is needed to verify these findings.

脑卒中后抑郁对康复病房脑卒中患者功能结果的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
目的调查康复病房中脑卒中后抑郁症的患病率,并阐明其对功能改善和预后的影响.设计回顾性队列研究.设置一所大学医院的疗养康复病房.参与者共有 114 名脑卒中患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 67.2 [13.主要结果测量在病房住院期间的功能独立性测量(FIM)效率。结果根据迷你国际神经精神访谈,有7名患者(9.6%)患有抑郁症。非抑郁组的 FIM 总效率和运动项目小计的 FIM 效率明显高于抑郁组(中位数[四分位间范围]:0.69 [0.39-0.40]] :分别为 0.69 [0.39-0.95] vs 0.41 [0.24-0.63],P=.027;0.56 [0.38-0.80] vs 0.42 [0.18-0.49],P=.023)。非抑郁组患者出院时的 FIM 评分较高(中位数[四分位数间距]:116.0 [104.5-111.0]; 中位数[四分位数间距分别为 116.0 [104.5-123.0] vs 104.0 [82.5-112.0],P=.013),并且更有可能出院回家(80.6% vs 36.4%,P=.003)。此外,抑郁组患者在病房的逗留时间也明显更长(71.0 [36.1] vs 106.1 [43.3],P=.010)。结论卒中后抑郁患者的功能恢复效率低于无抑郁患者,需要今后开展样本量更大的多中心研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信