Diagnostic Accuracy of a Three-point Compression Ultrasonography Performed by Emergency Medicine Resident for the Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: a Prospective Diagnostic Study

Q2 Medicine
Fatemeh Jahanian, Iraj Goli Khatir, Elham-sadat Bani-mostafavi, S. Moradi, Fatemeh Hosseini Aghamalaki
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of a Three-point Compression Ultrasonography Performed by Emergency Medicine Resident for the Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: a Prospective Diagnostic Study","authors":"Fatemeh Jahanian, Iraj Goli Khatir, Elham-sadat Bani-mostafavi, S. Moradi, Fatemeh Hosseini Aghamalaki","doi":"10.5455/aim.2019.27.119-122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common cause of admission to the emergency departments (ED). Doppler ultrasonography of the entire lower limb is the first-line imaging modality. But most EDs do not access to full-time radiologists which can lead to delayed diagnosis. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of three-point compression ultrasonography performed by emergency medicine resident for diagnosis of DVT. Methods: This prospective diagnostic study was carried out at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Sari from March 2018 to November 2018. For all patients with suspected lower extremity DVT, first bedside 3-point compression ultrasound were performed by a third year emergency medicine resident at ED. Then Doppler ultrasonography were performed by a radiologist in the radiology department, as a reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the three-point compression ultrasound performed by emergency medicine resident was calculated. Results: Of the 72 patients enrolled in our study, 50% of the patients were male, with an average age of 36±19 years. The mean of patient admission time to perform ultrasonography by an emergency medicine resident and radiologist were 14.05±19 and 216±140.1 minutes, respectively. The two groups had a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001). In ultrasonography performed by emergency medicine resident and doper ultrasonography by radiologist, 91.67% and 36.1% of patients were diagnosed with DVT, respectively. Although the ultrasonography performed by emergency medicine resident has a relatively low sensitivity (53.8%), it has a good specificity (85.7%). The positive and negative predictive value was 70 and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: Although the results of this study indicate insufficient sensitivity of bedside three-point compression ultrasound performed by emergency medicine resident in diagnosis of lower limb DVT, the specificity, positive and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratio were almost appropriate.","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":"27 1","pages":"119 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2019.27.119-122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common cause of admission to the emergency departments (ED). Doppler ultrasonography of the entire lower limb is the first-line imaging modality. But most EDs do not access to full-time radiologists which can lead to delayed diagnosis. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of three-point compression ultrasonography performed by emergency medicine resident for diagnosis of DVT. Methods: This prospective diagnostic study was carried out at Imam Khomeini Hospital in Sari from March 2018 to November 2018. For all patients with suspected lower extremity DVT, first bedside 3-point compression ultrasound were performed by a third year emergency medicine resident at ED. Then Doppler ultrasonography were performed by a radiologist in the radiology department, as a reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the three-point compression ultrasound performed by emergency medicine resident was calculated. Results: Of the 72 patients enrolled in our study, 50% of the patients were male, with an average age of 36±19 years. The mean of patient admission time to perform ultrasonography by an emergency medicine resident and radiologist were 14.05±19 and 216±140.1 minutes, respectively. The two groups had a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001). In ultrasonography performed by emergency medicine resident and doper ultrasonography by radiologist, 91.67% and 36.1% of patients were diagnosed with DVT, respectively. Although the ultrasonography performed by emergency medicine resident has a relatively low sensitivity (53.8%), it has a good specificity (85.7%). The positive and negative predictive value was 70 and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: Although the results of this study indicate insufficient sensitivity of bedside three-point compression ultrasound performed by emergency medicine resident in diagnosis of lower limb DVT, the specificity, positive and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratio were almost appropriate.
急诊医师三点压超声诊断深静脉血栓的准确性:一项前瞻性诊断研究
引言:深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是急诊科常见的入院原因。整个下肢的多普勒超声是一线成像方式。但大多数急诊科医生无法接触到全职放射科医生,这可能导致诊断延迟。目的:本研究的目的是评估急诊住院医师进行的三点压缩超声对DVT的诊断准确性。方法:本前瞻性诊断研究于2018年3月至2018年11月在萨里伊玛目霍梅尼医院进行。对于所有疑似下肢深静脉血栓形成的患者,首先由急诊科第三年的住院医师进行床边三点压缩超声检查。然后由放射科的放射科医生进行多普勒超声检查,作为参考检查。计算急诊住院医师进行三点压迫超声检查的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值。结果:在我们研究的72名患者中,50%的患者是男性,平均年龄为36±19岁。急诊住院医师和放射科医生进行超声检查的平均患者入院时间分别为14.05±19和216±140.1分钟。急诊住院医师的超声检查和放射科医生的多普勒超声检查中,诊断DVT的患者分别为91.67%和36.1%。急诊住院医师超声检查的敏感性较低(53.8%),但特异性较好(85.7%),阳性和阴性预测值分别为70%和75%。结论:尽管本研究的结果表明急诊住院医师进行的床边三点压迫超声诊断下肢DVT的敏感性不足,但其特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性似然比几乎是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信