Population-level Outcomes of Early Thyroid Cancers: A Need to Revisit Current Practice

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
P. Chaturvedi, A. Singh, A. Bhattacharjee, V. Tuljapurkar, D. Nair, D. Chaukar, R. Dikshit
{"title":"Population-level Outcomes of Early Thyroid Cancers: A Need to Revisit Current Practice","authors":"P. Chaturvedi, A. Singh, A. Bhattacharjee, V. Tuljapurkar, D. Nair, D. Chaukar, R. Dikshit","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Early thyroid cancers have excellent long-term outcomes, yet the word “cancer” draws unnecessary apprehension. This study aimed to define when the recommendations for observation and surveillance may be extended to early thyroid cancers at the population level. Methods Non-metastasized thyroid cancers ≤40 mm diameter were identified from the 1975–2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Causes of death were compared across demographic data. Disease-specific outcomes were compared to the age-adjusted healthy United States (US) population. Survival estimates were computed using Kaplan–Meier and compared using the Cox proportional hazard model. Dynamic benchmarks impacting disease-specific overall survival were determined by decision tree modeling and tested by the Cox model. Results Of the 28,728 thyroid cancers included in this study, 98.4% underwent some form of thyroid-specific treatment and were followed for a maximum of 10.9 years. This group had a 4.3% mortality rate at the end of follow-up (10.9 years maximum), with 13 times more deaths attributed to competing risks rather than thyroid cancer (stage T1a versus stage T1b, P=1.000; T1 versus T2, P<0.001). Among the untreated T1a or T1b tumors, the risk of disease-specific death was 21 times lower than death due to other causes. There was no significant difference between T1a and T1b tumors nor across sex. The age-adjusted risk of death for the healthy US population was higher than for the population with thyroid cancer. Dynamic categorization demonstrated worsening outcomes up to 73 years, uninfluenced by sex or tumor size. For patients over 73 years of age, only tumors >26 mm impacted outcomes. Conclusion Based on the current data, T1a and T1b nodules have similar survival outcomes and are not significantly impacted even when left untreated. Multi-institutional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings so that current observation and surveillance recommendations can be extended to certain T1 thyroid nodules.","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Early thyroid cancers have excellent long-term outcomes, yet the word “cancer” draws unnecessary apprehension. This study aimed to define when the recommendations for observation and surveillance may be extended to early thyroid cancers at the population level. Methods Non-metastasized thyroid cancers ≤40 mm diameter were identified from the 1975–2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Causes of death were compared across demographic data. Disease-specific outcomes were compared to the age-adjusted healthy United States (US) population. Survival estimates were computed using Kaplan–Meier and compared using the Cox proportional hazard model. Dynamic benchmarks impacting disease-specific overall survival were determined by decision tree modeling and tested by the Cox model. Results Of the 28,728 thyroid cancers included in this study, 98.4% underwent some form of thyroid-specific treatment and were followed for a maximum of 10.9 years. This group had a 4.3% mortality rate at the end of follow-up (10.9 years maximum), with 13 times more deaths attributed to competing risks rather than thyroid cancer (stage T1a versus stage T1b, P=1.000; T1 versus T2, P<0.001). Among the untreated T1a or T1b tumors, the risk of disease-specific death was 21 times lower than death due to other causes. There was no significant difference between T1a and T1b tumors nor across sex. The age-adjusted risk of death for the healthy US population was higher than for the population with thyroid cancer. Dynamic categorization demonstrated worsening outcomes up to 73 years, uninfluenced by sex or tumor size. For patients over 73 years of age, only tumors >26 mm impacted outcomes. Conclusion Based on the current data, T1a and T1b nodules have similar survival outcomes and are not significantly impacted even when left untreated. Multi-institutional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings so that current observation and surveillance recommendations can be extended to certain T1 thyroid nodules.
早期甲状腺癌的人群水平结果:需要重新审视当前的做法
背景:早期甲状腺癌具有良好的长期预后,然而“癌症”一词引起了不必要的担忧。本研究旨在确定观察和监测的建议何时可以扩展到人群水平的早期甲状腺癌。方法从1975-2016年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定直径≤40 mm的非转移性甲状腺癌。通过人口统计数据对死亡原因进行比较。将疾病特异性结果与年龄调整后的健康美国人群进行比较。生存估计使用Kaplan-Meier计算,并使用Cox比例风险模型进行比较。通过决策树模型确定影响疾病特异性总体生存的动态基准,并通过Cox模型进行测试。结果在本研究纳入的28,728例甲状腺癌中,98.4%的患者接受了某种形式的甲状腺特异性治疗,随访时间最长为10.9年。在随访结束时,该组的死亡率为4.3%(最长10.9年),由于竞争风险而不是甲状腺癌导致的死亡多出13倍(T1a期与T1b期,P=1.000;T1与T2相比,P26 mm影响预后。根据目前的数据,T1a和T1b结节具有相似的生存结局,即使不治疗也没有明显影响。需要多机构的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现,以便目前的观察和监测建议可以扩展到某些T1甲状腺结节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信