Analisis Taksonomi pada Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Literasi Membaca di SMK Negeri 3 Pekanbaru

Shafira Wardatul Aini, M. Mukhlis
{"title":"Analisis Taksonomi pada Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Literasi Membaca di SMK Negeri 3 Pekanbaru","authors":"Shafira Wardatul Aini, M. Mukhlis","doi":"10.30872/diglosia.v5i4.513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) measures literacy achievement to map the quality of education in Indonesia with international standards. This AKM aims to identify student achievements when working on AKM questions in terms of the reading literacy process. The importance of AKM training is to improve teacher skills in developing learning frameworks that lead to students' reasoning in literacy. This study aims to determine the cognitive level of reading literacy AKM at SMK Negeri 3 Pekanbaru. This research method is content analysis with a qualitative approach. The analysis uses qualitative methods to interpret the cognitive level of the items. Based on the study results, the instrument question classification I percentage was 80% for C2 (Understanding); and 20% for C4 (Analysis). The percentage of instrument II questions is 74% for C2 (Understanding), 22% for C4 (Analysis), and 3% for C6 (Create). The cognitive level dominates the lower level, namely C2 (Understanding). While cognitive levels such as C1 (Remembering), C3 (Applying), C4 (Analyzing), C5 (Creating), and C6 (Evaluating) were found to be very few and had not even appeared in the AKM Reading Literacy question at SMK Negeri 3 Pekanbaru.","PeriodicalId":33926,"journal":{"name":"Diglosia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diglosia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i4.513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) measures literacy achievement to map the quality of education in Indonesia with international standards. This AKM aims to identify student achievements when working on AKM questions in terms of the reading literacy process. The importance of AKM training is to improve teacher skills in developing learning frameworks that lead to students' reasoning in literacy. This study aims to determine the cognitive level of reading literacy AKM at SMK Negeri 3 Pekanbaru. This research method is content analysis with a qualitative approach. The analysis uses qualitative methods to interpret the cognitive level of the items. Based on the study results, the instrument question classification I percentage was 80% for C2 (Understanding); and 20% for C4 (Analysis). The percentage of instrument II questions is 74% for C2 (Understanding), 22% for C4 (Analysis), and 3% for C6 (Create). The cognitive level dominates the lower level, namely C2 (Understanding). While cognitive levels such as C1 (Remembering), C3 (Applying), C4 (Analyzing), C5 (Creating), and C6 (Evaluating) were found to be very few and had not even appeared in the AKM Reading Literacy question at SMK Negeri 3 Pekanbaru.
SMK新农村3区运动员最低能力文献阅读的分类分析
最低能力评估(AKM)衡量识字成绩,以使印度尼西亚的教育质量符合国际标准。本AKM旨在确定学生在阅读识字过程中处理AKM问题时的成就。AKM培训的重要性在于提高教师在制定学习框架方面的技能,从而引导学生在识字方面进行推理。本研究旨在确定SMK Negeri 3 Pekanbaru的阅读素养AKM的认知水平。这种研究方法是采用定性方法进行内容分析。该分析使用定性方法来解释项目的认知水平。根据研究结果,C2(理解)的工具问题分类I百分比为80%;C4为20%(分析)。C2(理解)、C4(分析)和C6(创建)的工具II问题比例分别为74%、22%和3%。认知水平支配着较低的层次,即C2(理解)。而C1(记忆)、C3(应用)、C4(分析)、C5(创造)和C6(评估)等认知水平被发现很少,甚至没有出现在SMK Negeri 3 Pekanbaru的AKM阅读素养问题中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信