Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of venous thromboembolism

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Maodi Xu, Qingquan Xue, Zhichen Pu, Zijing Wu, Haitang Xie
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of venous thromboembolism","authors":"Maodi Xu, Qingquan Xue, Zhichen Pu, Zijing Wu, Haitang Xie","doi":"10.3329/BJP.V13I3.37124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. A total of 6 studies met the inclusion criteria and a total of 19,350 patients with venous thromboembolism were included. Among them, rivaroxaban (3 RCTs, n=90/3,449/4,832); dabigatran (2 RCTs, n=200/2,539); edoxaban (1 RCT, n=8,240). The results of meta-analysis showed that the total bleeding rate after treatment with the vitamin K antagonist group was higher than with the new oral anticoagulant group (OR=0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.75-0.90, p<0.0001), and the difference was highly statistically significant. Overall, new oral anticoagulants are compara-ble to vitamin K antagonists, but new oral anticoagulants can reduce the occurrence of bleeding events and the safety was superior to vitamin K antagonists.","PeriodicalId":8719,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/BJP.V13I3.37124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/BJP.V13I3.37124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. A total of 6 studies met the inclusion criteria and a total of 19,350 patients with venous thromboembolism were included. Among them, rivaroxaban (3 RCTs, n=90/3,449/4,832); dabigatran (2 RCTs, n=200/2,539); edoxaban (1 RCT, n=8,240). The results of meta-analysis showed that the total bleeding rate after treatment with the vitamin K antagonist group was higher than with the new oral anticoagulant group (OR=0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.75-0.90, p<0.0001), and the difference was highly statistically significant. Overall, new oral anticoagulants are compara-ble to vitamin K antagonists, but new oral anticoagulants can reduce the occurrence of bleeding events and the safety was superior to vitamin K antagonists.
新型口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗静脉血栓栓塞症的疗效和安全性
本荟萃分析的目的是系统评价新型口服抗凝剂和维生素K拮抗剂治疗静脉血栓栓塞症的疗效和安全性。共有6项研究符合纳入标准,共有19350名静脉血栓栓塞患者被纳入。其中,利伐沙班(3例随机对照试验,n=90/3449/4832);达比加群(2例随机对照试验,n=200/2539);依多沙班(1例随机对照试验,n=8240)。荟萃分析结果显示,维生素K拮抗剂组治疗后的总出血率高于新口服抗凝剂组(OR=0.82,95%置信区间0.75-0.90,p<0.0001),差异具有高度统计学意义。总的来说,新型口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂相当,但新型口服抗凝血剂可以减少出血事件的发生,安全性优于维生素K拮抗药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology
Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
18.80%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology (Bangladesh J Pharmacol) is an open access, video component, peer-reviewed journal of the Bangladesh Pharmacological Society (BDPS). A scholarly publication is defined ''open access'' when there are no financial, legal or technical barriers to accessing it. Anyone can read, download, copy, distribute, print or use it in educational purpose within the legal agreements. Peer review of a manuscript means the evaluation of research work by one or more people with similar competences. It can be open or blind. We do the single-blind peer review. Our readers want to know the methodology used by the researchers which is very important to get the results. The video clip of one of the methodologies is prepared by the authors and submit it to publish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信