Standardization and certification save us from the frustrations of the Greek drama

IASSIST quarterly Pub Date : 2019-05-10 DOI:10.29173/IQ953
K. Rasmussen
{"title":"Standardization and certification save us from the frustrations of the Greek drama","authors":"K. Rasmussen","doi":"10.29173/IQ953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to the first issue of volume 43 of the IASSIST Quarterly (IQ 43:1, 2019). \nThe IASSIST Quarterly presents in this issue three papers illustrated in the title above. Chronologically we start from an early beginning. No, not with Turing, we time travel further back and experience ancient Greece. In this submission the Greek drama delivers the form, while data librarians deliver the content on data sharing. And it makes you a proud IASSISTer to know that altruism is the rationale behind data sharing. The drama continues in the second submission when librarians get frustrated because they suddenly find themselves first as data librarians and second as frustrated data librarians because ends do not meet when the librarians have difficulties servicing the data needs of their users, in combination with the users having unrealistic expectations. Finally, the third article is about standardization and certification that makes the librarians more secure that they are on the right track when building a TDR (Trustworthy Digital Repository). Enjoy the reading. \nThe first article is different from most articles. There is a first for everything! Not often are we at IQ offered a Greek drama. And here is one on data sharing. The article needed the layout of a play so even the typeface of this contribution is different. The paper / play is called 'An epic journey in sharing: The story of a young researcher’s journey to share her data and the information professionals who tried to help’. The authors are Sebastian Karcher and Sophia Lafferty-Hess at Duke University Libraries. The reason for using Greek drama as a template is that form can help us think differently - 'out of the box’! The play demonstrates the positive intention of data sharing, and by sharing contributing to something larger. The article references other researchers showing that scholarly altruism is a driving force for data sharers. No matter the good intentions of the protagonist, she finds herself locked in a situation where she is not able to take identifiable data with her when leaving the institution. And leaving the university is what undergraduates do. Without the identification, it is impossible to obtain re-consent from participants. Yes, it does look murky but there is even a happy ending in the epilogue.   \nThe second article is about librarianship, and how that task is not always easy. 'Frustrations and roadblocks in data reference librarianship’ is by Alicia Kubas and Jenny McBurney who work at the University of Minnesota Libraries. Like many others, they have observed that many librarians find themselves as 'accidental data librarians'. That this brings frustration can be seen in the results of a survey they carried out. The methodology is explained, and descriptive statistics bring insight to what librarians do as well as to the frustrations and roadblocks they experience. Let us start with the good news: some librarians are never frustrated with data questions. The bad news is that only 3% fall into that category. On the other hand, 83% mention 'managing patron expectations’ among their biggest frustrations. It sounds as if matching of expectations should be a course at library school. Maybe it is already, and users with high expectations simply do not understand the complexity of the work involved. Fortunately, some frustrations can be lessened by experience, but there are others – called roadblocks, e.g. paywalls or lack of geographic coverage ­– that all librarians meet. Among the comments after the survey was that data persist as a difficult source type for librarians to support. The questionnaire developed and used by Kubas and McBurney is found in an appendix. \nThe last article in this issue raises sustainability as an important issue for long term data preservation, and the concept forms part of the title of the submission 'CoreTrustSeal: From academic collaboration to sustainable services'. The paper is from an international group of authors comprising Hervé L'Hours, Mari Kleemola, and Lisa de Leeuw from UK, Finland and the Netherlands. The seal is a certification for repositories curating data. The last sentence in the abstract sums up the content of the paper: 'As well as providing a historical narrative and current and future perspectives, the CoreTrustSeal experience offers lessons for those involved in developing standards and best practices or seeking to develop cooperative and community-driven efforts bridging data curation activities across academic disciplines, governmental and private sectors'. In order to attain CoreTrustSeal TDR certification and become a Trustworthy Digital Repository (TDR), the repository has to fulfil 16 requirements and the CoreTrustSeal foundation maintains these requirements and the audit procedures. The certification draws on preservation standards and models as found in Open Archival Information Systems and in the catalogues of ISO and DIN standards. The authors emphasize that the CoreTrustSeal is founded on and developed in a spirit of openness and community. The paper's sharing of the experience follows that spirit.   \nSubmissions of papers for the IASSIST Quarterly are always very welcome. We welcome input from IASSIST conferences or other conferences and workshops, from local presentations or papers especially written for the IQ. When you are preparing such a presentation, give a thought to turning your one-time presentation into a lasting contribution. Doing that after the event also gives you the opportunity of improving your work after feedback. We encourage you to login or create an author login to https://www.iassistquarterly.com (our Open Journal System application). We permit authors 'deep links' into the IQ as well as deposition of the paper in your local repository. Chairing a conference session with the purpose of aggregating and integrating papers for a special issue IQ is also much appreciated as the information reaches many more people than the limited number of session participants and will be readily available on the IASSIST Quarterly website at https://www.iassistquarterly.com.  Authors are very welcome to take a look at the instructions and layout: \nhttps://www.iassistquarterly.com/index.php/iassist/about/submissions \nAuthors can also contact me directly via e-mail: kbr@sam.sdu.dk. Should you be interested in compiling a special issue for the IQ as guest editor(s) I will also be delighted to hear from you. \nKarsten Boye Rasmussen - May 2019","PeriodicalId":84870,"journal":{"name":"IASSIST quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IASSIST quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/IQ953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Welcome to the first issue of volume 43 of the IASSIST Quarterly (IQ 43:1, 2019). The IASSIST Quarterly presents in this issue three papers illustrated in the title above. Chronologically we start from an early beginning. No, not with Turing, we time travel further back and experience ancient Greece. In this submission the Greek drama delivers the form, while data librarians deliver the content on data sharing. And it makes you a proud IASSISTer to know that altruism is the rationale behind data sharing. The drama continues in the second submission when librarians get frustrated because they suddenly find themselves first as data librarians and second as frustrated data librarians because ends do not meet when the librarians have difficulties servicing the data needs of their users, in combination with the users having unrealistic expectations. Finally, the third article is about standardization and certification that makes the librarians more secure that they are on the right track when building a TDR (Trustworthy Digital Repository). Enjoy the reading. The first article is different from most articles. There is a first for everything! Not often are we at IQ offered a Greek drama. And here is one on data sharing. The article needed the layout of a play so even the typeface of this contribution is different. The paper / play is called 'An epic journey in sharing: The story of a young researcher’s journey to share her data and the information professionals who tried to help’. The authors are Sebastian Karcher and Sophia Lafferty-Hess at Duke University Libraries. The reason for using Greek drama as a template is that form can help us think differently - 'out of the box’! The play demonstrates the positive intention of data sharing, and by sharing contributing to something larger. The article references other researchers showing that scholarly altruism is a driving force for data sharers. No matter the good intentions of the protagonist, she finds herself locked in a situation where she is not able to take identifiable data with her when leaving the institution. And leaving the university is what undergraduates do. Without the identification, it is impossible to obtain re-consent from participants. Yes, it does look murky but there is even a happy ending in the epilogue.   The second article is about librarianship, and how that task is not always easy. 'Frustrations and roadblocks in data reference librarianship’ is by Alicia Kubas and Jenny McBurney who work at the University of Minnesota Libraries. Like many others, they have observed that many librarians find themselves as 'accidental data librarians'. That this brings frustration can be seen in the results of a survey they carried out. The methodology is explained, and descriptive statistics bring insight to what librarians do as well as to the frustrations and roadblocks they experience. Let us start with the good news: some librarians are never frustrated with data questions. The bad news is that only 3% fall into that category. On the other hand, 83% mention 'managing patron expectations’ among their biggest frustrations. It sounds as if matching of expectations should be a course at library school. Maybe it is already, and users with high expectations simply do not understand the complexity of the work involved. Fortunately, some frustrations can be lessened by experience, but there are others – called roadblocks, e.g. paywalls or lack of geographic coverage ­– that all librarians meet. Among the comments after the survey was that data persist as a difficult source type for librarians to support. The questionnaire developed and used by Kubas and McBurney is found in an appendix. The last article in this issue raises sustainability as an important issue for long term data preservation, and the concept forms part of the title of the submission 'CoreTrustSeal: From academic collaboration to sustainable services'. The paper is from an international group of authors comprising Hervé L'Hours, Mari Kleemola, and Lisa de Leeuw from UK, Finland and the Netherlands. The seal is a certification for repositories curating data. The last sentence in the abstract sums up the content of the paper: 'As well as providing a historical narrative and current and future perspectives, the CoreTrustSeal experience offers lessons for those involved in developing standards and best practices or seeking to develop cooperative and community-driven efforts bridging data curation activities across academic disciplines, governmental and private sectors'. In order to attain CoreTrustSeal TDR certification and become a Trustworthy Digital Repository (TDR), the repository has to fulfil 16 requirements and the CoreTrustSeal foundation maintains these requirements and the audit procedures. The certification draws on preservation standards and models as found in Open Archival Information Systems and in the catalogues of ISO and DIN standards. The authors emphasize that the CoreTrustSeal is founded on and developed in a spirit of openness and community. The paper's sharing of the experience follows that spirit.   Submissions of papers for the IASSIST Quarterly are always very welcome. We welcome input from IASSIST conferences or other conferences and workshops, from local presentations or papers especially written for the IQ. When you are preparing such a presentation, give a thought to turning your one-time presentation into a lasting contribution. Doing that after the event also gives you the opportunity of improving your work after feedback. We encourage you to login or create an author login to https://www.iassistquarterly.com (our Open Journal System application). We permit authors 'deep links' into the IQ as well as deposition of the paper in your local repository. Chairing a conference session with the purpose of aggregating and integrating papers for a special issue IQ is also much appreciated as the information reaches many more people than the limited number of session participants and will be readily available on the IASSIST Quarterly website at https://www.iassistquarterly.com.  Authors are very welcome to take a look at the instructions and layout: https://www.iassistquarterly.com/index.php/iassist/about/submissions Authors can also contact me directly via e-mail: kbr@sam.sdu.dk. Should you be interested in compiling a special issue for the IQ as guest editor(s) I will also be delighted to hear from you. Karsten Boye Rasmussen - May 2019
标准化和认证将我们从希腊戏剧的挫折中拯救出来
欢迎阅读IASSIST季刊(IQ 43:1, 2019)第43卷第一期。《IASSIST季刊》在这期中发表了上述标题所示的三篇论文。按时间顺序,我们从早期开始。不,不是图灵,我们穿越到更遥远的古希腊。在这个提交中,希腊戏剧提供了形式,而数据图书管理员提供了数据共享的内容。当你知道利他主义是数据共享背后的基本原理时,你会成为一名自豪的IASSISTer。戏剧在第二次提交中继续上演,当图书管理员突然发现自己首先是数据管理员而感到沮丧时,当图书管理员难以满足用户的数据需求时,再加上用户有不切实际的期望,他们就会感到沮丧。最后,第三篇文章是关于标准化和认证的,标准化和认证使图书馆员在构建TDR(可信数字存储库)时更加安全。享受阅读。第一篇文章与大多数文章不同。凡事都有第一次!在IQ,我们很少能看到希腊戏剧。这是一个关于数据共享的。这篇文章需要一个剧本的布局,所以即使是这个贡献的字体也是不同的。这篇论文/戏剧被称为“史诗般的分享之旅:一个年轻研究人员分享她的数据和信息专业人士试图帮助的故事”。作者是杜克大学图书馆的Sebastian Karcher和Sophia Lafferty-Hess。用希腊戏剧作为模板的原因是,形式可以帮助我们以不同的方式思考——“跳出框框”!该剧展示了数据共享的积极意图,并通过共享做出更大的贡献。这篇文章引用了其他研究人员,表明学术利他主义是数据共享的推动力。无论主人公的初衷是什么,当她离开机构时,她发现自己陷入了一种无法带走可识别数据的境地。离开大学是本科生该做的事。没有身份证明,就不可能获得参与者的再次同意。是的,它确实看起来很模糊,但在后记中甚至有一个快乐的结局。第二篇文章是关于图书馆的,以及这项任务并不总是那么容易。《数据参考图书馆工作中的挫折和障碍》一书的作者是在明尼苏达大学图书馆工作的艾丽西亚·库巴斯(Alicia Kubas)和珍妮·麦克伯尼(Jenny McBurney)。像其他许多人一样,他们发现许多图书馆员发现自己是“偶然的数据图书馆员”。从他们进行的一项调查结果可以看出,这带来了挫败感。对方法进行了解释,描述性统计揭示了图书馆员所做的工作以及他们所经历的挫折和障碍。让我们从好消息开始:一些图书管理员从来不会对数据问题感到沮丧。坏消息是,只有3%的人属于这一类。另一方面,83%的人提到“管理顾客期望”是他们最大的挫折之一。听起来,符合期望应该是图书馆学校的一门课程。也许已经是这样了,期望很高的用户根本不了解所涉及工作的复杂性。幸运的是,一些挫折可以通过经验来减轻,但也有其他的挫折——被称为障碍,例如付费墙或缺乏地理覆盖——所有图书馆员都会遇到。在调查后的评论中,数据仍然是图书馆员难以支持的一种来源类型。Kubas和McBurney开发和使用的问卷见附录。本期的最后一篇文章将可持续性作为长期数据保存的一个重要问题提出,这一概念构成了提交的标题“CoreTrustSeal:从学术合作到可持续服务”的一部分。这篇论文是由来自英国、芬兰和荷兰的herv<s:1> L'Hours、Mari Kleemola和Lisa de Leeuw组成的一个国际小组撰写的。印章是存储库管理数据的认证。摘要的最后一句话总结了论文的内容:“CoreTrustSeal的经验为那些参与制定标准和最佳实践或寻求发展合作和社区驱动的努力的人提供了经验教训,这些努力将跨学科、政府和私营部门的数据管理活动联系起来。”为了获得CoreTrustSeal TDR认证并成为值得信赖的数字存储库(TDR),存储库必须满足16个要求,CoreTrustSeal基金会维护这些要求和审计程序。该认证借鉴了开放档案信息系统以及ISO和DIN标准目录中的保存标准和模型。 作者强调,CoreTrustSeal是在开放和社区精神的基础上建立和发展起来的。《纽约时报》对这一经历的分享也遵循了这种精神。IASSIST季刊非常欢迎提交论文。我们欢迎来自IASSIST会议或其他会议和研讨会的意见,来自当地的演讲或专门为IQ编写的论文。当你准备这样的演讲时,考虑一下把你的一次演讲变成一个持久的贡献。事后做这件事也能让你有机会在得到反馈后改进你的工作。我们鼓励您登录或创建一个作者登录https://www.iassistquarterly.com(我们的开放期刊系统应用程序)。我们允许作者“深度链接”到IQ以及沉积在您的本地存储库中的论文。主持一次会议,目的是为某一期IQ特刊收集和整合论文,这也是非常值得赞赏的,因为这些信息可以传递给更多的人,而不仅仅是有限的会议参与者,而且可以在IASSIST季刊网站https://www.iassistquarterly.com上随时获得。作者们非常欢迎看看说明和布局:https://www.iassistquarterly.com/index.php/iassist/about/submissions作者也可以直接通过电子邮件与我联系:kbr@sam.sdu.dk。如果您有兴趣作为客座编辑为《IQ》编辑一期特刊,我也将很高兴收到您的来信。卡斯滕·博耶·拉斯穆森- 2019年5月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信