The informal tripart relationship between the state, neighbourhood police and community groups: community safety perceptions and practices in a Midlands neighbourhood in the UK

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
S. Page, Sean Griffin
{"title":"The informal tripart relationship between the state, neighbourhood police and community groups: community safety perceptions and practices in a Midlands neighbourhood in the UK","authors":"S. Page, Sean Griffin","doi":"10.1108/sc-03-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore the tripart relationship between British police officers, Local Authority representatives and community members based on a Midlands neighbourhood case study. It focuses on experiences of the strengths and challenges with working towards a common purpose of community safety and resilience building.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData was collected in 2019 prior to enforced COVID lockdown restrictions following Staffordshire University ethical approval. An inductive qualitative methods approach of semi-structured individual and group interviews was used with community members (N = 30) and professionals (N = 15), using a purposive and snowball sample. A steering group with academic, police and Local Authority representation co-designed the study and identified the first tier of participants.\n\n\nFindings\nCommunity members and professionals valued tripart working and perceived communication, visibility, longevity and trust as key to addressing localised community safety issues. Challenges were raised around communication modes and frequency, cultural barriers to accessing information and inadequate resources and responses to issues. Environmental crime was a high priority for community members, along with tackling drug-related crime and diverting youth disorder, which concurred with police concern. However, the anti-terrorism agenda was a pre-occupation for the Local Authority, and school concerns included modern slavery crime.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhen state involvement and investment in neighbourhoods decline, community member activism enthusiasm for neighbourhood improvement reduces, contrasting with government expectations. Community members are committed partnership workers who require the state to visibly and demonstrably engage. Faith in state actors can be restored when professionals are consistently present, communicate and follow up on actions.\n","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-03-2023-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the tripart relationship between British police officers, Local Authority representatives and community members based on a Midlands neighbourhood case study. It focuses on experiences of the strengths and challenges with working towards a common purpose of community safety and resilience building. Design/methodology/approach Data was collected in 2019 prior to enforced COVID lockdown restrictions following Staffordshire University ethical approval. An inductive qualitative methods approach of semi-structured individual and group interviews was used with community members (N = 30) and professionals (N = 15), using a purposive and snowball sample. A steering group with academic, police and Local Authority representation co-designed the study and identified the first tier of participants. Findings Community members and professionals valued tripart working and perceived communication, visibility, longevity and trust as key to addressing localised community safety issues. Challenges were raised around communication modes and frequency, cultural barriers to accessing information and inadequate resources and responses to issues. Environmental crime was a high priority for community members, along with tackling drug-related crime and diverting youth disorder, which concurred with police concern. However, the anti-terrorism agenda was a pre-occupation for the Local Authority, and school concerns included modern slavery crime. Originality/value When state involvement and investment in neighbourhoods decline, community member activism enthusiasm for neighbourhood improvement reduces, contrasting with government expectations. Community members are committed partnership workers who require the state to visibly and demonstrably engage. Faith in state actors can be restored when professionals are consistently present, communicate and follow up on actions.
国家、社区警察和社区团体之间的非正式三方关系:英国中部地区社区的社区安全观念和实践
本文旨在探讨英国警察、地方政府代表和社区成员之间的三方关系。它侧重于为实现社区安全和复原力建设的共同目标而努力的优势和挑战的经验。设计/方法/方法数据是在斯塔福德郡大学伦理批准后,于2019年在强制实施COVID封锁限制之前收集的。采用半结构化的个人和团体访谈的归纳定性方法,对社区成员(N = 30)和专业人员(N = 15)进行了有目的和滚雪球式的访谈。一个由学术界、警方和地方当局代表组成的指导小组共同设计了这项研究,并确定了第一级参与者。社区成员和专业人士重视三方合作,认为沟通、能见度、寿命和信任是解决当地社区安全问题的关键。在沟通方式和频率、获取信息的文化障碍、资源不足和对问题的反应等方面提出了挑战。环境犯罪是社区成员的首要任务,此外还有处理与毒品有关的犯罪和转移青少年的混乱,这与警方的关注是一致的。然而,反恐议程是地方当局的当务之急,学校关注的问题包括现代奴隶制犯罪。原创性/价值当国家对社区的参与和投资减少时,社区成员改善社区的积极性就会降低,这与政府的期望相反。社区成员是忠诚的伙伴关系工作者,他们要求国家明显地参与进来。当专业人员始终在场、沟通并跟进行动时,就可以恢复对国家行为者的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信