Lived Experience Perspectives on Ableism Within and Beyond Music Therapists’ Professional Identities

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
C. Shaw, Victoria Churchill, S. Curtain, Allison Davies, Brede Davis, Zoe Kalenderidis, Emily Langlois Hunt, Benjamin McKenzie, Megan Murray, G. Thompson
{"title":"Lived Experience Perspectives on Ableism Within and Beyond Music Therapists’ Professional Identities","authors":"C. Shaw, Victoria Churchill, S. Curtain, Allison Davies, Brede Davis, Zoe Kalenderidis, Emily Langlois Hunt, Benjamin McKenzie, Megan Murray, G. Thompson","doi":"10.1093/mtp/miac001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The 10 authors contributing to this reflective essay are comprised of music therapy practitioners, academics, and students with lived experience of disability, neurodivergence, or/and chronic physical and mental health conditions. We will discuss the impact of ableism in our music therapy work, both for participants and for music therapists. Beyond outright discrimination of people with disability, ableism is typically linked to an agenda to normalize and cure. In contrast, music therapists working from a position of post-ableist music therapy seek to collaboratively provide conditions and musical experiences that are less disabling and restrictive through addressing barriers and facilitating connections. We will discuss how including post-ableist perspectives might also create safer spaces for music therapists with lived experience of disability, neurodivergence, and/or chronic physical and mental health conditions. In this critical commentary, we wish to move from a deficit understanding of therapists with lived experience that is often implicit in codes of ethics and standards of practice, to one that celebrates the richness and knowledge that our experience brings. To embed post-ableist perspectives into our profession at all levels, we will discuss the implications for student training and supervision when accessibility is centered in practicum and classroom learning activities. In conclusion, we aim to make apparent the fact that therapists can and do come in all forms and with all backgrounds and that recognizing health diversity in our profession benefits us all.","PeriodicalId":44813,"journal":{"name":"Music Therapy Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Therapy Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miac001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The 10 authors contributing to this reflective essay are comprised of music therapy practitioners, academics, and students with lived experience of disability, neurodivergence, or/and chronic physical and mental health conditions. We will discuss the impact of ableism in our music therapy work, both for participants and for music therapists. Beyond outright discrimination of people with disability, ableism is typically linked to an agenda to normalize and cure. In contrast, music therapists working from a position of post-ableist music therapy seek to collaboratively provide conditions and musical experiences that are less disabling and restrictive through addressing barriers and facilitating connections. We will discuss how including post-ableist perspectives might also create safer spaces for music therapists with lived experience of disability, neurodivergence, and/or chronic physical and mental health conditions. In this critical commentary, we wish to move from a deficit understanding of therapists with lived experience that is often implicit in codes of ethics and standards of practice, to one that celebrates the richness and knowledge that our experience brings. To embed post-ableist perspectives into our profession at all levels, we will discuss the implications for student training and supervision when accessibility is centered in practicum and classroom learning activities. In conclusion, we aim to make apparent the fact that therapists can and do come in all forms and with all backgrounds and that recognizing health diversity in our profession benefits us all.
音乐治疗师职业身份内外残疾的生活体验视角
这篇反思性文章的10位作者包括音乐治疗从业者、学者和有残疾、神经分化或/或慢性身心健康经历的学生。我们将讨论能力主义在我们的音乐治疗工作中的影响,无论是对参与者还是对音乐治疗师。除了对残疾人的彻底歧视之外,残疾主义通常与正常化和治愈的议程联系在一起。相比之下,处于后能者音乐治疗地位的音乐治疗师寻求通过解决障碍和促进联系,共同提供不那么致残和限制的条件和音乐体验。我们将讨论如何将后能者的观点纳入其中,为有残疾、神经分化和/或慢性身心健康经历的音乐治疗师创造更安全的空间。在这篇批评性的评论中,我们希望从对具有生活经验的治疗师的理解不足转变为对我们的经验所带来的丰富性和知识的赞美。为了将后能力主义观点融入我们各个层面的职业,我们将讨论当无障碍性以实践和课堂学习活动为中心时,对学生培训和监督的影响。总之,我们的目标是明确一个事实,即治疗师可以而且确实有各种形式和背景,承认我们职业中的健康多样性对我们所有人都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Music Therapy Perspectives
Music Therapy Perspectives REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信