A Metainvestigation of Speaking Skills: Practice, Feedback, and Self-Directed Efforts

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Shoba Kanare Nandagopal;Ruth Sara Philip
{"title":"A Metainvestigation of Speaking Skills: Practice, Feedback, and Self-Directed Efforts","authors":"Shoba Kanare Nandagopal;Ruth Sara Philip","doi":"10.1109/TPC.2023.3251140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<bold>Background:</b>\n Fluent and accurate speaking is an essential set of skills that engineering students strive to achieve, as they can lead to better job placement and a promising future. This article documents a speaking assessment carried out among 120 engineering students who have undergone two semesters of Technical English courses in the final year of their study. The students from diverse departments opted for the English for Competitive Exams elective course to improve their English language proficiency. The objective of the elective is to train the learners in essential language components for facing high-stakes competitive exams with an integrated language skills approach. \n<bold>Literature review:</b>\n This linguistics-focused study documents a cluster strategy, a pedagogical attempt at speaking, with a culminating self-reflection phase. The strategy cluster was thoughtfully designed and integrated throughout the semester to enhance the students' speaking competency. \n<bold>Research questions:</b>\n 1. How do learners perceive the effectiveness of speaking skills practice given to them in the online sessions? 2. What benefits through feedback have learners achieved during these sessions? 3. How do students perceive the role of self-directed efforts toward improving their speaking skills? \n<bold>Methods:</b>\n Students were trained on speaking skills as part of a semester-long online course, and an assessment for speaking skills was designed in which students answered 10 self-reflective questions about their perception and usefulness of practice, feedback from the instructor and peers, and self-directed efforts. Each student's recorded audio file of an average of 11 minutes 24 seconds was uploaded to the learning management system (LMS) as part of the assessment. A qualitative and interpretative investigation of their answers reflecting their learning experiences during the semester, based on the activities and self-regulation, and their self-rating were analyzed thematically. \n<bold>Results and discussion:</b>\n The findings of the metainvestigation show significantly valuable insights with potential implications on the language teachers’ perception of teaching speaking skills in the classroom, especially in the current online environment. \n<bold>Conclusions:</b>\n We conclude that using the strategy cluster comprising practice, feedback, and self-directed efforts with a culminating phase of oral self-reflection is highly beneficial in developing speaking skills in engineering courses focusing on technical communication.","PeriodicalId":46950,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","volume":"66 2","pages":"170-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10094233/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluent and accurate speaking is an essential set of skills that engineering students strive to achieve, as they can lead to better job placement and a promising future. This article documents a speaking assessment carried out among 120 engineering students who have undergone two semesters of Technical English courses in the final year of their study. The students from diverse departments opted for the English for Competitive Exams elective course to improve their English language proficiency. The objective of the elective is to train the learners in essential language components for facing high-stakes competitive exams with an integrated language skills approach. Literature review: This linguistics-focused study documents a cluster strategy, a pedagogical attempt at speaking, with a culminating self-reflection phase. The strategy cluster was thoughtfully designed and integrated throughout the semester to enhance the students' speaking competency. Research questions: 1. How do learners perceive the effectiveness of speaking skills practice given to them in the online sessions? 2. What benefits through feedback have learners achieved during these sessions? 3. How do students perceive the role of self-directed efforts toward improving their speaking skills? Methods: Students were trained on speaking skills as part of a semester-long online course, and an assessment for speaking skills was designed in which students answered 10 self-reflective questions about their perception and usefulness of practice, feedback from the instructor and peers, and self-directed efforts. Each student's recorded audio file of an average of 11 minutes 24 seconds was uploaded to the learning management system (LMS) as part of the assessment. A qualitative and interpretative investigation of their answers reflecting their learning experiences during the semester, based on the activities and self-regulation, and their self-rating were analyzed thematically. Results and discussion: The findings of the metainvestigation show significantly valuable insights with potential implications on the language teachers’ perception of teaching speaking skills in the classroom, especially in the current online environment. Conclusions: We conclude that using the strategy cluster comprising practice, feedback, and self-directed efforts with a culminating phase of oral self-reflection is highly beneficial in developing speaking skills in engineering courses focusing on technical communication.
口语技能的元调查:练习、反馈和自我导向的努力
背景:流利准确的口语是工科学生努力实现的一套基本技能,因为它们可以带来更好的工作安排和充满希望的未来。本文对120名工程系学生进行了口语评估,这些学生在学习的最后一年参加了两个学期的技术英语课程。来自不同院系的学生选择了竞争性考试英语选修课,以提高他们的英语水平。选修课的目的是通过综合语言技能的方法,培训学习者应对高风险竞争性考试的基本语言组成部分。文献综述:这项以语言学为重点的研究记录了一种集群策略,一种说话的教学尝试,以及最终的自我反思阶段。策略组在整个学期经过深思熟虑的设计和整合,以提高学生的口语能力。研究问题:1。学习者如何看待在线课程中给予他们的口语技能练习的有效性?2.在这些课程中,学习者通过反馈获得了哪些好处?3.学生如何看待自主努力对提高口语技能的作用?方法:作为为期一学期的在线课程的一部分,对学生进行了口语技能培训,并设计了口语技能评估,其中学生回答了10个关于他们对实践的感知和有用性、教师和同伴的反馈以及自我指导的努力的自我反思问题。作为评估的一部分,每个学生平均11分24秒的录音文件被上传到学习管理系统(LMS)。基于活动和自我调节,对他们的回答进行了定性和解释性调查,反映了他们在学期中的学习经历,并对他们的自我评价进行了主题分析。结果和讨论:元调查的结果显示了非常有价值的见解,对语言教师在课堂上,尤其是在当前的网络环境中,对教学口语技能的感知具有潜在的影响。结论:我们得出的结论是,在注重技术交流的工程课程中,使用由实践、反馈和自我指导的努力组成的策略集群,并在口头自我反思的最终阶段,对培养口语技能非常有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to applied research on professional communication—including but not limited to technical and business communication. Papers should address the research interests and needs of technical communicators, engineers, scientists, information designers, editors, linguists, translators, managers, business professionals, and others from around the globe who practice, conduct research on, and teach others about effective professional communication. The Transactions publishes original, empirical research that addresses one of these contexts: The communication practices of technical professionals, such as engineers and scientists The practices of professional communicators who work in technical or business environments Evidence-based methods for teaching and practicing professional and technical communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信