The importance of assessing the SMA margin in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

IF 0.3 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
D. Jeyarajah, H. Osman, D. Dietemann, D. Jeyarajah
{"title":"The importance of assessing the SMA margin in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy","authors":"D. Jeyarajah, H. Osman, D. Dietemann, D. Jeyarajah","doi":"10.5348/100082z04ec2019oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aim: The purpose of this study is to examine the true incidence of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) positivity in patients who have superior mesenteric vein (SMV) positivity while undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).\n\n Methods: All patients who underwent PD for PDAC between January 2005 and December 2011 were retrospectively identified from our database. Patients deemed resectable by NCCN guidelines, protocol CT scans, and endoscopic ultrasound were included. The PD specimen was inked using five colors to specifically identify and study the SMV and SMA margins. We also analyzed and compared R1-sub groups (R1A group- SMA and SMV positive; R1B group - SMV positive, SMA negative).\n\n Results: 98 patients underwent PD for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 75 patients (76.5%) were found to have negative surgical margin on final pathology (R0 group) while 23 patients (23.4%) had positive SMV margins (R1 group). In the R1 group, 11 patients (47.8%) were found to have positive SMA margin (R1A group) and 12 patients were SMV positive and SMA negative (R1B group). No statistically significant survival difference was noted between R0 and R1 or between R1-A and R1-B.\n\n Conclusion: This study demonstrates that with careful inking of the SMA and SMV margins, there is a high rate of concurrent SMA positivity in those patients that are SMV positive. There was no impact on survival. Accurate margin assessment is critical by careful examination and inking of the SMA and SMV margin.\n","PeriodicalId":40532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100082z04ec2019oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to examine the true incidence of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) positivity in patients who have superior mesenteric vein (SMV) positivity while undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: All patients who underwent PD for PDAC between January 2005 and December 2011 were retrospectively identified from our database. Patients deemed resectable by NCCN guidelines, protocol CT scans, and endoscopic ultrasound were included. The PD specimen was inked using five colors to specifically identify and study the SMV and SMA margins. We also analyzed and compared R1-sub groups (R1A group- SMA and SMV positive; R1B group - SMV positive, SMA negative). Results: 98 patients underwent PD for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 75 patients (76.5%) were found to have negative surgical margin on final pathology (R0 group) while 23 patients (23.4%) had positive SMV margins (R1 group). In the R1 group, 11 patients (47.8%) were found to have positive SMA margin (R1A group) and 12 patients were SMV positive and SMA negative (R1B group). No statistically significant survival difference was noted between R0 and R1 or between R1-A and R1-B. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that with careful inking of the SMA and SMV margins, there is a high rate of concurrent SMA positivity in those patients that are SMV positive. There was no impact on survival. Accurate margin assessment is critical by careful examination and inking of the SMA and SMV margin.
评估SMA边缘在胰十二指肠切除术患者中的重要性
目的:本研究旨在探讨肠系膜上静脉(SMV)阳性患者在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)治疗胰腺癌(PDAC)时肠系膜上动脉(SMA)阳性的真实发生率。方法:回顾性分析2005年1月至2011年12月期间因PDAC接受PD治疗的所有患者。根据NCCN指南、协议CT扫描和内窥镜超声检查认为可切除的患者包括在内。PD标本使用五种颜色进行染色,以明确识别和研究SMV和SMA边缘。我们还分析和比较了r1亚组(R1A组- SMA和SMV阳性;R1B组- SMV阳性,SMA阴性)。结果:98例可切除胰腺癌行PD治疗。R0组手术切缘阴性75例(76.5%),R1组SMV切缘阳性23例(23.4%)。R1组SMA切缘阳性11例(47.8%)(R1A组),SMV阳性和SMA阴性12例(R1B组)。R0与R1之间、R1- a与R1- b之间生存率无统计学差异。结论:本研究表明,通过仔细连接SMA和SMV边缘,SMV阳性患者同时出现SMA阳性的比例很高。对生存率没有影响。通过仔细检查和连接SMA和SMV边缘,准确的边际评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信