How are milk substitutes labelled in the UK? Should the term ‘milk’ be added to milk substitute labelling?

IF 5.1 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
K. De-loyde, Mark A. Pilling, M. Munafo, A. Attwood, O. Maynard
{"title":"How are milk substitutes labelled in the UK? Should the term ‘milk’ be added to milk substitute labelling?","authors":"K. De-loyde, Mark A. Pilling, M. Munafo, A. Attwood, O. Maynard","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Existing regulation in the UK states that the term ‘milk’ can only be used in labelling to describe products that originate from animals. We conducted an observational study, which surveyed the availability and labelling of milk substitutes in UK supermarkets, and an online experimental study, which assessed the impact of using the term ‘milk’ on milk substitute labelling. In the experimental study, 352 UK adults were randomised to one of the two conditions where they saw milk substitutes that were either labelled with UK regulations (e.g., soya drink) or using the term ‘milk’ (e.g., soya milk). Our primary aims were to assess whether adding the term ‘milk’ to labels would (1) more accurately communicate the uses of milk substitutes or (2) confuse consumers about which products come from an animal source. In our observational study, milk substitutes were readily available and labelling varied significantly. In our experimental study, labelling products with the term ‘milk’ increased understanding of the product's use. However, participants who saw the term ‘milk’ on milk substitute labelling misidentified more milk substitutes as coming from an animal source. Future policy should consider the clarification of such labelling.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing regulation in the UK states that the term ‘milk’ can only be used in labelling to describe products that originate from animals. We conducted an observational study, which surveyed the availability and labelling of milk substitutes in UK supermarkets, and an online experimental study, which assessed the impact of using the term ‘milk’ on milk substitute labelling. In the experimental study, 352 UK adults were randomised to one of the two conditions where they saw milk substitutes that were either labelled with UK regulations (e.g., soya drink) or using the term ‘milk’ (e.g., soya milk). Our primary aims were to assess whether adding the term ‘milk’ to labels would (1) more accurately communicate the uses of milk substitutes or (2) confuse consumers about which products come from an animal source. In our observational study, milk substitutes were readily available and labelling varied significantly. In our experimental study, labelling products with the term ‘milk’ increased understanding of the product's use. However, participants who saw the term ‘milk’ on milk substitute labelling misidentified more milk substitutes as coming from an animal source. Future policy should consider the clarification of such labelling.
在英国,牛奶替代品的标签是怎样的?“牛奶”一词应该添加到牛奶替代品的标签上吗?
英国现行法规规定,“牛奶”一词只能用于描述源自动物的产品的标签。我们进行了一项观察性研究,调查了英国超市牛奶替代品的可用性和标签,并进行了一次在线实验研究,评估了使用“牛奶”一词对牛奶替代品标签的影响。在这项实验研究中,352名英国成年人被随机分配到两种情况中的一种,即他们看到的牛奶替代品要么标有英国法规(如大豆饮料),要么使用“牛奶”一词(如豆浆)。我们的主要目的是评估在标签中添加“牛奶”一词是否会(1)更准确地传达牛奶替代品的用途,或(2)混淆消费者哪些产品来自动物来源。在我们的观察性研究中,牛奶替代品很容易获得,标签差异很大。在我们的实验研究中,在产品上贴上“牛奶”一词可以加深对产品用途的理解。然而,在牛奶替代品标签上看到“牛奶”一词的参与者错误地认为,更多的牛奶替代品来自动物来源。未来的政策应该考虑澄清这种标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信