Effects of habitat loss on Brazilian primates: assessing extinction thresholds in the Amazon and Atlantic Forest

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Carmen Galán-Acedo , Ricard Arasa-Gisbert , Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez , Marisela Martínez-Ruiz , Fernando A. Rosete-Vergés , Fabricio Villalobos
{"title":"Effects of habitat loss on Brazilian primates: assessing extinction thresholds in the Amazon and Atlantic Forest","authors":"Carmen Galán-Acedo ,&nbsp;Ricard Arasa-Gisbert ,&nbsp;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Marisela Martínez-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Fernando A. Rosete-Vergés ,&nbsp;Fabricio Villalobos","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Habitat loss has major impacts on biodiversity. Yet, such impacts are not always linear, as there can be threshold values of habitat amount below which species become extirpated from human-modified landscapes (extinction thresholds). This may be particularly the case for species with high habitat spatial requirements, especially in regions with a long land-use history, which have a lower extinction debt. To address these issues, we evaluated the linear and non-linear effects of landscape-scale forest (habitat) loss on primate species richness in regions with relatively new (Amazon) and old (Atlantic Forest) histories of land-use change. We also evaluated the role of mean home range size in regulating species responses to forest loss. Extinction thresholds were higher in the Atlantic Forest (78% remaining forest cover) than in the Amazon (45%), but primate-landscape associations were stronger in the Amazon. Thus, despite its recent land-use history, Amazon primates are more sensitive to habitat loss. As predicted, mean home range size decreased with forest loss in both biomes. Our findings highlight the importance of stopping deforestation in both biomes to maintain habitat amount above these thresholds. Yet, as &lt;30% of the Atlantic Forest cover remains today, promoting restoration initiatives across this biome is paramount.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"21 2","pages":"Pages 189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Habitat loss has major impacts on biodiversity. Yet, such impacts are not always linear, as there can be threshold values of habitat amount below which species become extirpated from human-modified landscapes (extinction thresholds). This may be particularly the case for species with high habitat spatial requirements, especially in regions with a long land-use history, which have a lower extinction debt. To address these issues, we evaluated the linear and non-linear effects of landscape-scale forest (habitat) loss on primate species richness in regions with relatively new (Amazon) and old (Atlantic Forest) histories of land-use change. We also evaluated the role of mean home range size in regulating species responses to forest loss. Extinction thresholds were higher in the Atlantic Forest (78% remaining forest cover) than in the Amazon (45%), but primate-landscape associations were stronger in the Amazon. Thus, despite its recent land-use history, Amazon primates are more sensitive to habitat loss. As predicted, mean home range size decreased with forest loss in both biomes. Our findings highlight the importance of stopping deforestation in both biomes to maintain habitat amount above these thresholds. Yet, as <30% of the Atlantic Forest cover remains today, promoting restoration initiatives across this biome is paramount.

Abstract Image

栖息地丧失对巴西灵长类动物的影响:评估亚马逊和大西洋森林的灭绝阈值
生境丧失对生物多样性有重大影响。然而,这种影响并不总是线性的,因为可能存在栖息地数量的阈值,低于该阈值,物种就会从人类改造的景观中灭绝(灭绝阈值)。对于栖息地空间要求高的物种,特别是在土地利用历史悠久的地区,这种情况可能尤其如此,这些地区的灭绝债务较低。为了解决这些问题,我们在土地利用变化历史相对较新(亚马逊河流域)和较老(大西洋森林)的地区,评估了景观尺度森林(栖息地)丧失对灵长类物种丰富度的线性和非线性影响。我们还评估了平均栖息地大小在调节物种对森林损失的反应中的作用。大西洋森林的灭绝阈值(78%)高于亚马逊森林(45%),但亚马逊森林的灵长类动物与景观的关联更强。因此,尽管亚马逊的土地利用历史较近,但灵长类动物对栖息地的丧失更为敏感。正如预测的那样,两个生物群系的平均家园面积随着森林的减少而减少。我们的研究结果强调了在这两个生物群落中停止森林砍伐以保持栖息地数量高于这些阈值的重要性。然而,由于今天大西洋森林覆盖面积仍有30%,因此在整个生物群落中推动恢复行动至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信