Case studies from the experience of early career researchers in East Africa in building community engagement in research

Joel L. Bargul, Denna M. Mkwashapi, I. Namagembe, Immaculate Nakityo, A. Nakimuli, J. Byamugisha, Daniel Semakula, J. Seeley, N. Sewankambo
{"title":"Case studies from the experience of early career researchers in East Africa in building community engagement in research","authors":"Joel L. Bargul, Denna M. Mkwashapi, I. Namagembe, Immaculate Nakityo, A. Nakimuli, J. Byamugisha, Daniel Semakula, J. Seeley, N. Sewankambo","doi":"10.12688/openresafrica.13349.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In this paper, we explain how three early career researchers actively engaged community members in their health research projects in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, and what was learnt from the experience. The research project in Kenya was on camel trypanosomiasis and the role of camel biting keds (or louse flies) in disease transmission. The project in Tanzania looked at the effect of human immunodeficiency virus and antiretroviral therapy on fertility and ascertained the trends in the use of family planning services amongst women of reproductive age. The focus of the project in Uganda was the implementation of maternal death surveillance and the response policy to determine the cause of maternal deaths and how they might be prevented. Methods: In the three different settings, efforts to ensure local community engagement provided a focus for the researchers to hone their skills in explaining research concepts and working in partnership with community members to co-develop ideas, their research methods and outputs. Results: Involvement of communities in scientific research, which entailed a two-way mutual engagement process, led to (i) generation of new research ideas that shaped the work, (ii) strengthened mutual trust, and (iii) promoted uptake of research findings. Conclusion: Our key findings strongly support the need for considering community engagement as one of the key components in research studies.","PeriodicalId":74358,"journal":{"name":"Open research Africa","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openresafrica.13349.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In this paper, we explain how three early career researchers actively engaged community members in their health research projects in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, and what was learnt from the experience. The research project in Kenya was on camel trypanosomiasis and the role of camel biting keds (or louse flies) in disease transmission. The project in Tanzania looked at the effect of human immunodeficiency virus and antiretroviral therapy on fertility and ascertained the trends in the use of family planning services amongst women of reproductive age. The focus of the project in Uganda was the implementation of maternal death surveillance and the response policy to determine the cause of maternal deaths and how they might be prevented. Methods: In the three different settings, efforts to ensure local community engagement provided a focus for the researchers to hone their skills in explaining research concepts and working in partnership with community members to co-develop ideas, their research methods and outputs. Results: Involvement of communities in scientific research, which entailed a two-way mutual engagement process, led to (i) generation of new research ideas that shaped the work, (ii) strengthened mutual trust, and (iii) promoted uptake of research findings. Conclusion: Our key findings strongly support the need for considering community engagement as one of the key components in research studies.
来自东非早期职业研究人员在建立社区参与研究方面经验的案例研究
背景:在本文中,我们解释了三位早期职业研究人员在肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚和乌干达如何积极地让社区成员参与他们的健康研究项目,以及从经验中学到了什么。肯尼亚的研究项目是关于骆驼锥虫病和骆驼咬蝇(或虱子蝇)在疾病传播中的作用。坦桑尼亚的项目研究了人体免疫缺陷病毒和抗逆转录病毒疗法对生育力的影响,并查明了育龄妇女使用计划生育服务的趋势。乌干达项目的重点是实施产妇死亡监测和应对政策,以确定产妇死亡的原因以及如何预防产妇死亡。方法:在三种不同的环境中,确保当地社区参与的努力为研究人员提供了一个重点,以磨练他们在解释研究概念和与社区成员合作以共同发展思想、研究方法和产出方面的技能。结果:社区参与科学研究,这需要一个双向的相互参与过程,导致(i)产生新的研究思想,塑造了工作,(ii)加强了相互信任,(iii)促进了研究成果的吸收。结论:我们的主要发现强烈支持将社区参与作为研究的关键组成部分之一的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信