{"title":"Designed for failure: English instruction as a tool for the perpetuation of students’ dependent and dominated status","authors":"Sham Haidar","doi":"10.1080/19313152.2021.1928843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT English, being used predominantly at the official level, in higher education, and in the job market, is the most sought after language in Pakistan. Access to quality instruction in and for English, however, remains a dream for most of the socio-economically disadvantaged students. This study explores the amount, intensity, and quality of access to English instruction in general school systems in Pakistan through a phenomenological multi-case study perspective. Employing symbolic power and sociolinguistics of globalization as theoretical framework, observations of and interviews with the relevant stakeholders were used as instruments of data collection. The data were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach. The findings suggest that the very education system hinders the students studying at general schools from ever achieving the high-level English skills that could accrue cultural, symbolic or economic capital for them. The general schools inculcate in students a habit to be dependent instead of original thinkers and to resolve with the fate of serving at lower social positions, thereby perpetuating their dominated status. The general schools are thus breeding social inequality and stifling the mobility of the underprivileged students. Language education policymakers and practitioners, therefore, need to reform education systems in order to rectify the inequality perpetuated.","PeriodicalId":46090,"journal":{"name":"International Multilingual Research Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"363 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19313152.2021.1928843","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Multilingual Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2021.1928843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
ABSTRACT English, being used predominantly at the official level, in higher education, and in the job market, is the most sought after language in Pakistan. Access to quality instruction in and for English, however, remains a dream for most of the socio-economically disadvantaged students. This study explores the amount, intensity, and quality of access to English instruction in general school systems in Pakistan through a phenomenological multi-case study perspective. Employing symbolic power and sociolinguistics of globalization as theoretical framework, observations of and interviews with the relevant stakeholders were used as instruments of data collection. The data were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach. The findings suggest that the very education system hinders the students studying at general schools from ever achieving the high-level English skills that could accrue cultural, symbolic or economic capital for them. The general schools inculcate in students a habit to be dependent instead of original thinkers and to resolve with the fate of serving at lower social positions, thereby perpetuating their dominated status. The general schools are thus breeding social inequality and stifling the mobility of the underprivileged students. Language education policymakers and practitioners, therefore, need to reform education systems in order to rectify the inequality perpetuated.
期刊介绍:
The International Multilingual Research Journal (IMRJ) invites scholarly contributions with strong interdisciplinary perspectives to understand and promote bi/multilingualism, bi/multi-literacy, and linguistic democracy. The journal’s focus is on these topics as related to languages other than English as well as dialectal variations of English. It has three thematic emphases: the intersection of language and culture, the dialectics of the local and global, and comparative models within and across contexts. IMRJ is committed to promoting equity, access, and social justice in education, and to offering accessible research and policy analyses to better inform scholars, educators, students, and policy makers. IMRJ is particularly interested in scholarship grounded in interdisciplinary frameworks that offer insights from linguistics, applied linguistics, education, globalization and immigration studies, cultural psychology, linguistic and psychological anthropology, sociolinguistics, literacy studies, post-colonial studies, critical race theory, and critical theory and pedagogy. It seeks theoretical and empirical scholarship with implications for research, policy, and practice. Submissions of research articles based on quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods are encouraged. The journal includes book reviews and two occasional sections: Perspectives and Research Notes. Perspectives allows for informed debate and exchanges on current issues and hot topics related to bi/multilingualism, bi/multi-literacy, and linguistic democracy from research, practice, and policy perspectives. Research Notes are shorter submissions that provide updates on major research projects and trends in the field.