Two German Perspectives on a German Discussion

IF 0.4 3区人文科学 Q1 HISTORY

Central European History Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1017/S0008938923000067

W. Gruner, S. Schüler-Springorum

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This contribution results from a place of serious discomfort regarding recent public and academic discussions in Germany, where Holocaust memory and its political instrumentalization have seemed to produce a growing dogmatism, harming academic freedom. Because we both direct university research centers in Berlin and Los Angeles dedicated to the study of the Holocaust, we have decided to join forces and share our particular German perspectives on this debate. Our views are in part generational, in part personal.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一场德国讨论的两种德国观点

这一贡献源于德国最近对公众和学术讨论的严重不安，在那里，大屠杀记忆及其政治工具化似乎产生了越来越多的教条主义，损害了学术自由。由于我们都是柏林和洛杉矶专门研究大屠杀的大学研究中心的负责人，我们决定联合起来，分享我们对这场辩论的独特的德国观点。我们的观点部分是代际的，部分是个人的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Central European History Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Central European History offers articles, review essays, and book reviews that range widely through the history of Germany, Austria, and other German-speaking regions of Central Europe from the medieval era to the present. All topics and approaches to history are welcome, whether cultural, social, political, diplomatic, intellectual, economic, and military history, as well as historiography and methodology. Contributions that treat new fields, such as post-1945 and post-1989 history, maturing fields such as gender history, and less-represented fields such as medieval history and the history of the Habsburg lands are especially desired. The journal thus aims to be the primary venue for scholarly exchange and debate among scholars of the history of Central Europe.