Analyzing Decision-Making Factors for Using Social Media: the Role Trust and Information Sharing

Maulida Isti'anah, U. Suhud, Osly Usman
{"title":"Analyzing Decision-Making Factors for Using Social Media: the Role Trust and Information Sharing","authors":"Maulida Isti'anah, U. Suhud, Osly Usman","doi":"10.15421/192213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study is aimed at explaining the factors that influence a person to decide to use TikTok in the Jabodetabek (Jakarta-Bogor-Depok-Tangerang-Bekasi) area. This study also uses the variables of self-efficacy, utilitarian value, hedonic value, information sharing, trust, and decision-making. \nDesign/Method/Approach: Quantitative approaches and explanatory research are used in this study. Respondents were consumers who used the TikTok application in the Jabodetabek area to determine the number of samples. The present study uses non-probability sampling and convenience sampling techniques with 252 respondents. Data collection methods used questionnaires, and data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) method with the help of AMOS 24. \nFindings: The findings of this study indicate that self-efficacy and hedonic value positively affect trust, and trust positively affects information sharing and decision-making. Nevertheless, the results of this study also explain that self-efficacy does not affect information sharing. The utilitarian value does not significantly affect trust, and information sharing does not affect decision-making. \nPractical Implications: Social media service providers should focus on the influence of information sharing and decision-making in the TikTok application, namely trust. One example is making efforts to improve consumer trust by protecting the personal information which consumers provide on social networking sites and developing the TikTok application as advertising for business. This study can be used as a reference for advertisers when choosing advertising media in the TikTok application because hedonic values influence trust in the TikTok application. Advertisers are advised to promote products by providing hedonic value, such as TikTok dance. \nOriginality/Value: The use of the TikTok application is a trend that is currently popular. We tried to perform this research by using a dependent variable of decision-making that is not easy to find and is used in marketing studies. \nPaper type: Empirical","PeriodicalId":32724,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Management Issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Management Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/192213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study is aimed at explaining the factors that influence a person to decide to use TikTok in the Jabodetabek (Jakarta-Bogor-Depok-Tangerang-Bekasi) area. This study also uses the variables of self-efficacy, utilitarian value, hedonic value, information sharing, trust, and decision-making. Design/Method/Approach: Quantitative approaches and explanatory research are used in this study. Respondents were consumers who used the TikTok application in the Jabodetabek area to determine the number of samples. The present study uses non-probability sampling and convenience sampling techniques with 252 respondents. Data collection methods used questionnaires, and data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) method with the help of AMOS 24. Findings: The findings of this study indicate that self-efficacy and hedonic value positively affect trust, and trust positively affects information sharing and decision-making. Nevertheless, the results of this study also explain that self-efficacy does not affect information sharing. The utilitarian value does not significantly affect trust, and information sharing does not affect decision-making. Practical Implications: Social media service providers should focus on the influence of information sharing and decision-making in the TikTok application, namely trust. One example is making efforts to improve consumer trust by protecting the personal information which consumers provide on social networking sites and developing the TikTok application as advertising for business. This study can be used as a reference for advertisers when choosing advertising media in the TikTok application because hedonic values influence trust in the TikTok application. Advertisers are advised to promote products by providing hedonic value, such as TikTok dance. Originality/Value: The use of the TikTok application is a trend that is currently popular. We tried to perform this research by using a dependent variable of decision-making that is not easy to find and is used in marketing studies. Paper type: Empirical
社交媒体使用决策因素分析:角色信任与信息共享
目的:本研究旨在解释影响一个人决定在Jabodetabek(雅加达-茂物-德波克-唐格朗-贝卡西)地区使用TikTok的因素。本研究还使用了自我效能、功利价值、享乐价值、信息共享、信任和决策等变量。设计/方法/方法:本研究采用了定量方法和解释性研究。受访者是在Jabodetabek地区使用TikTok应用程序来确定样本数量的消费者。本研究采用非概率抽样和方便抽样技术对252名受访者进行了调查。数据收集方法采用问卷调查,并在AMOS 24的帮助下使用探索性因素分析(EFA)和结构方程建模(SEM)方法对数据进行分析。研究结果:本研究结果表明,自我效能感和享乐价值观对信任有正向影响,信任对信息共享和决策有正向影响。尽管如此,本研究的结果也解释了自我效能感并不影响信息共享。功利价值不会显著影响信任,信息共享也不会影响决策。实际意义:社交媒体服务提供商应关注TikTok应用程序中信息共享和决策的影响,即信任。一个例子是,通过保护消费者在社交网站上提供的个人信息,并将TikTok应用程序开发为商业广告,努力提高消费者的信任。这项研究可以作为广告商在TikTok应用程序中选择广告媒体的参考,因为享乐价值观会影响对TikToks应用程序的信任。建议广告商通过提供享乐价值来推广产品,比如TikTok舞蹈。创意/价值:使用TikTok应用程序是目前流行的趋势。我们试图通过使用一个不容易找到的决策因变量来进行这项研究,该因变量用于市场研究。论文类型:实证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信