(Ine)quality in Healthcare: a perspective from the accreditation of clinical laboratories in Costa Rica

IF 0.3 Q4 DEMOGRAPHY
Daniel Quesada-Yamasaki, Raúl Zeledón-Mayorga
{"title":"(Ine)quality in Healthcare: a perspective from the accreditation of clinical laboratories in Costa Rica","authors":"Daniel Quesada-Yamasaki, Raúl Zeledón-Mayorga","doi":"10.15517/psm.v19i2.46535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Given the relevance of quality-assured laboratory services for health system strengthening and improvement, this study had the objective of exploring the distribution of ISO 15189-accredited and non-accredited laboratories in Costa Rica, in order to identify possible gaps in the fulfillment of its commitment to provide ‘quality healthcare for all’. Methods: Our research was conducted with a descriptive scope and following a quantitative approach. Costa Rica’s Accreditation Body and College of Microbiologists databases were searched to collect data regarding clinical laboratory registration and ISO 15189 accreditation status. Laboratory availability indicators by geographical division were computed with this data. Results: Out of 480 clinical laboratories allowed to operate in Costa Rica as of January 2021, only 5 (about 1%) have been accredited in compliance with ISO 15189, all of which are private and located in the province of San José. Also, laboratory density (in terms of facilities per 100 km2 and per 100 000 population) is heterogeneous among provinces. Clinical laboratory services are more easily available in ‘central’ provinces of the country (e.g. San José and Heredia), where ratios for laboratory density are higher. On the contrary, coastal provinces such as Limón and Puntarenas exhibit low laboratory density ratios, reflecting geographical disparities in access to healthcare. Conclusions: Geographic disparities in the access to clinical laboratory services were observed. This should raise awareness among public health authorities and private healthcare providers regarding the country’s progress in attaining its ‘quality healthcare for all’ commitment.","PeriodicalId":41790,"journal":{"name":"Poblacion y Salud en Mesoamerica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poblacion y Salud en Mesoamerica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/psm.v19i2.46535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Given the relevance of quality-assured laboratory services for health system strengthening and improvement, this study had the objective of exploring the distribution of ISO 15189-accredited and non-accredited laboratories in Costa Rica, in order to identify possible gaps in the fulfillment of its commitment to provide ‘quality healthcare for all’. Methods: Our research was conducted with a descriptive scope and following a quantitative approach. Costa Rica’s Accreditation Body and College of Microbiologists databases were searched to collect data regarding clinical laboratory registration and ISO 15189 accreditation status. Laboratory availability indicators by geographical division were computed with this data. Results: Out of 480 clinical laboratories allowed to operate in Costa Rica as of January 2021, only 5 (about 1%) have been accredited in compliance with ISO 15189, all of which are private and located in the province of San José. Also, laboratory density (in terms of facilities per 100 km2 and per 100 000 population) is heterogeneous among provinces. Clinical laboratory services are more easily available in ‘central’ provinces of the country (e.g. San José and Heredia), where ratios for laboratory density are higher. On the contrary, coastal provinces such as Limón and Puntarenas exhibit low laboratory density ratios, reflecting geographical disparities in access to healthcare. Conclusions: Geographic disparities in the access to clinical laboratory services were observed. This should raise awareness among public health authorities and private healthcare providers regarding the country’s progress in attaining its ‘quality healthcare for all’ commitment.
医疗保健质量:从哥斯达黎加临床实验室认证的角度
引言:鉴于有质量保证的实验室服务与加强和改进卫生系统的相关性,本研究的目的是探索ISO 15189认证和非认证实验室在哥斯达黎加的分布情况,以确定在履行其“为所有人提供优质医疗保健”的承诺方面可能存在的差距。方法:我们的研究是在描述性的范围内进行的,并遵循定量的方法。检索了哥斯达黎加认证机构和微生物学家学院的数据库,以收集有关临床实验室注册和ISO 15189认证状态的数据。根据这些数据计算了按地域划分的实验室可用性指标。结果:截至2021年1月,哥斯达黎加允许运营的480个临床实验室中,只有5个(约1%)获得了ISO 15189认证,所有这些实验室都是私人实验室,位于圣何塞省。此外,各省份的实验室密度(以每100平方公里和每10万人口的设施为单位)也不尽相同。临床实验室服务在该国的“中部”省份(如圣何塞和埃雷迪亚)更容易获得,那里的实验室密度比更高。相反,利蒙和蓬塔雷纳斯等沿海省份的实验室密度比较低,反映出在获得医疗保健方面的地理差异。结论:在获得临床实验室服务方面存在地域差异。这应该提高公共卫生当局和私人医疗保健提供者对国家在实现“人人享有优质医疗保健”承诺方面取得的进展的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信