The Cultural Production of Everyday Ethics in Two University STEM Labs

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Allison Mickel, Adam Heidebrink-Bruno, Amin Hosseiny Marani, Isabel Barone, Olivia Lee, Eric P. S. Baumer
{"title":"The Cultural Production of Everyday Ethics in Two University STEM Labs","authors":"Allison Mickel, Adam Heidebrink-Bruno, Amin Hosseiny Marani, Isabel Barone, Olivia Lee, Eric P. S. Baumer","doi":"10.1177/02704676231181030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do ethics show up in the everyday behaviors and conversations of researchers in a scientific laboratory? How does the microcosmic culture of the laboratory shape researchers’ understandings of scientific ethics? We, an interdisciplinary team representing anthropology, computer science, and rhetorical studies, investigated these questions in two university STEM labs. Similar to previous work mapping out the epistemic cultures, we sought to understand the ethical cultures of these research groups. We observed their lab meetings for several months and conducted interviews with members of the research laboratories. Ultimately, we recognized two distinct ethical cultures within the two laboratories: one focused on the relationship between science and social justice, and the other focused on clean data and accuracy as an ethical issue. These two distinct ethical cultures were discernable through ethnography, close reading of laboratory members’ language, as well as broad-scale topic modeling. Our project complements previous studies of ethics in science that have focused on codes of ethics or student curricula as ways in which scientists develop an understanding of scientific ethics. Our project demonstrates that everyday interactions between the members of scientific research labs additionally shape, at a decidedly local level, how scientists understand and ultimately approach ethical decision-making in the scientific research process.","PeriodicalId":38848,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society","volume":"43 1","pages":"3 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676231181030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do ethics show up in the everyday behaviors and conversations of researchers in a scientific laboratory? How does the microcosmic culture of the laboratory shape researchers’ understandings of scientific ethics? We, an interdisciplinary team representing anthropology, computer science, and rhetorical studies, investigated these questions in two university STEM labs. Similar to previous work mapping out the epistemic cultures, we sought to understand the ethical cultures of these research groups. We observed their lab meetings for several months and conducted interviews with members of the research laboratories. Ultimately, we recognized two distinct ethical cultures within the two laboratories: one focused on the relationship between science and social justice, and the other focused on clean data and accuracy as an ethical issue. These two distinct ethical cultures were discernable through ethnography, close reading of laboratory members’ language, as well as broad-scale topic modeling. Our project complements previous studies of ethics in science that have focused on codes of ethics or student curricula as ways in which scientists develop an understanding of scientific ethics. Our project demonstrates that everyday interactions between the members of scientific research labs additionally shape, at a decidedly local level, how scientists understand and ultimately approach ethical decision-making in the scientific research process.
两所大学STEM实验室中日常伦理的文化生产
伦理是如何体现在科学实验室研究人员的日常行为和对话中的?实验室的微观文化如何塑造研究者对科学伦理的理解?我们是一个代表人类学、计算机科学和修辞学研究的跨学科团队,在两所大学的STEM实验室调查了这些问题。与之前绘制认知文化的工作类似,我们试图了解这些研究小组的伦理文化。我们观察了他们几个月的实验室会议,并采访了研究实验室的成员。最终,我们在这两个实验室中认识到了两种不同的伦理文化:一种侧重于科学和社会正义之间的关系,另一种则侧重于作为伦理问题的干净数据和准确性。这两种不同的伦理文化可以通过民族志、仔细阅读实验室成员的语言以及广泛的主题建模来辨别。我们的项目补充了以前对科学伦理的研究,这些研究侧重于伦理准则或学生课程,作为科学家发展对科学伦理理解的方式。我们的项目表明,科学研究实验室成员之间的日常互动在一定的地方层面上进一步塑造了科学家如何理解并最终处理科学研究过程中的道德决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信