A Comparison of Autism-Specific Training Outcomes for Teachers and Paraeducators

IF 1.9 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rebecca F Bertuccio, Megan C. Runion, Erica D. Culler, Jeremy Moeller, C. M. Hall
{"title":"A Comparison of Autism-Specific Training Outcomes for Teachers and Paraeducators","authors":"Rebecca F Bertuccio, Megan C. Runion, Erica D. Culler, Jeremy Moeller, C. M. Hall","doi":"10.1177/0888406419839771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most students with autism engage in the general education (GE) setting for a majority of the school day. Though there are standards to identify the expectations for educating students with autism in the inclusive classroom, GE teachers and paraeducators report limited knowledge and self-efficacy in supporting students with autism, and both indicate a need for more formal training in autism. In the present study, the authors analyzed GE teachers’ and paraeducators’ levels of knowledge and self-efficacy prior to and following autism-focused in-service training. Participants attended an informational and a practical training in which knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction were measured. Results for GE teachers and paraeducators followed similar patterns in that knowledge of autism increased significantly, but did not sustain over time. Levels of self-efficacy increased significantly following the practical training. GE teachers demonstrated higher levels of knowledge compared to paraeducators across time, while levels of self-efficacy converged between the two groups. Implications regarding training and professional development are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51596,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Education and Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0888406419839771","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Education and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419839771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Most students with autism engage in the general education (GE) setting for a majority of the school day. Though there are standards to identify the expectations for educating students with autism in the inclusive classroom, GE teachers and paraeducators report limited knowledge and self-efficacy in supporting students with autism, and both indicate a need for more formal training in autism. In the present study, the authors analyzed GE teachers’ and paraeducators’ levels of knowledge and self-efficacy prior to and following autism-focused in-service training. Participants attended an informational and a practical training in which knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction were measured. Results for GE teachers and paraeducators followed similar patterns in that knowledge of autism increased significantly, but did not sustain over time. Levels of self-efficacy increased significantly following the practical training. GE teachers demonstrated higher levels of knowledge compared to paraeducators across time, while levels of self-efficacy converged between the two groups. Implications regarding training and professional development are discussed.
教师和辅助教育者自闭症专项培训结果的比较
大多数自闭症学生在学校的大部分时间都在接受普通教育。尽管有标准来确定在包容性课堂上教育自闭症学生的期望,但通用电气的教师和辅助教育者报告称,在支持自闭症学生方面,知识和自我效能有限,这两种情况都表明需要对自闭症进行更正式的培训。在本研究中,作者分析了以自闭症为重点的在职培训前后通用电气教师和辅助教育工作者的知识水平和自我效能感。参与者参加了一次信息和实践培训,其中测量了知识、自我效能和满意度。通用电气教师和辅助教育者的结果遵循了类似的模式,即自闭症的知识显著增加,但并没有随着时间的推移而持续。实践训练后,自我效能感水平显著提高。与辅助教育者相比,通用电气教师在不同时期表现出更高的知识水平,而自我效能水平在两组之间趋于一致。讨论了对培训和专业发展的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teacher Education and Special Education
Teacher Education and Special Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信