Co-Shaping Metacognitive Awareness and Developing Listening Comprehension through Process-Based Instruction

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Neda Mahdavi, Mowla Miri
{"title":"Co-Shaping Metacognitive Awareness and Developing Listening Comprehension through Process-Based Instruction","authors":"Neda Mahdavi, Mowla Miri","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2016.1260454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effect of metacognitive process-based and product-based instruction on enhancing listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness. Two classes of high-beginner English as a foreign language learners were randomly assigned to two groups: product-based (n = 30) process-based (n = 30). Both before and after eight instructional sessions, listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness were measured. Process-based group, then, followed a pedagogical sequence in each session (Vandergrift, 2004), providing opportunities for dialogue about the listening process and the strategies involved, whereas the product-based group was not engaged in dialogue nor did the group reflect upon listening strategies. Results indicated that the process-based group significantly outperformed the product-based one in terms of gains in listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness. Moreover, the microgenetic analysis of the dialogic interactions of the process-based group presented some evidence showing how the students co-shaped metacognitive awareness. This article concludes with discussing the findings, presenting some pedagogical implications, and sketching out areas for further research.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":"33 1","pages":"53 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10904018.2016.1260454","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1260454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This study examined the effect of metacognitive process-based and product-based instruction on enhancing listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness. Two classes of high-beginner English as a foreign language learners were randomly assigned to two groups: product-based (n = 30) process-based (n = 30). Both before and after eight instructional sessions, listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness were measured. Process-based group, then, followed a pedagogical sequence in each session (Vandergrift, 2004), providing opportunities for dialogue about the listening process and the strategies involved, whereas the product-based group was not engaged in dialogue nor did the group reflect upon listening strategies. Results indicated that the process-based group significantly outperformed the product-based one in terms of gains in listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness. Moreover, the microgenetic analysis of the dialogic interactions of the process-based group presented some evidence showing how the students co-shaped metacognitive awareness. This article concludes with discussing the findings, presenting some pedagogical implications, and sketching out areas for further research.
元认知意识的塑造与过程型听力教学的发展
本研究考察了基于元认知过程和基于产品的教学对提高听力理解和元认知意识的影响。将两个高级初学者英语作为外语学习者随机分为两组:基于产品的(n=30)和基于过程的(n=30%)。在八次教学前后,测量了听力理解和元认知意识。然后,基于过程的小组在每节课中遵循教学顺序(Vandergrift,2004),提供了关于听力过程和所涉及的策略的对话机会,而基于产品的小组没有参与对话,也没有反思听力策略。结果表明,在听力理解和元认知意识方面,基于过程的小组明显优于基于产品的小组。此外,对基于过程的群体对话互动的微观成因分析提供了一些证据,表明学生是如何共同塑造元认知意识的。本文最后讨论了这些发现,提出了一些教学启示,并勾勒出了进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信