Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment—Resolved and Unresolved Issues (Review)

IF 0.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY

Advances in Gerontology Pub Date : 2021-12-09 DOI:10.1134/S207905702104007X

E. S. Lapteva, A. L. Ariev, M. R. Tsutsunava, G. T. Arieva

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The review presents an analysis of publications on the controversial issues of the use of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). For all its obvious significance and expediency, it remains unclear who should perform it, as well as where and when? Should it initially be one-step or step-by-step? What are the intermediate and end points of the study? Which tool for its screening is the least time-consuming and long-lasting? It is concluded that many issues have not yet been resolved and further research on this issue is required.

查看原文本刊更多论文

老年综合评估——已解决和未解决的问题（综述）

本综述分析了关于使用综合老年评估(CGA)的争议性问题的出版物。尽管它具有明显的意义和权宜之计，但目前尚不清楚应该由谁来执行，以及何时何地执行。一开始应该是一步还是一步?研究的中间点和终点是什么?哪种筛查工具最省时、最持久?得出结论，许多问题尚未解决，需要进一步研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Advances in Gerontology GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Advances in Gerontology focuses on biomedical aspects of aging. The journal also publishes original articles and reviews on progress in the following research areas: demography of aging; molecular and physiological mechanisms of aging, clinical gerontology and geriatrics, prevention of premature aging, medicosocial aspects of gerontology, and behavior and psychology of the elderly.