Evidence-based Appraisal of the DAPA-HF Trial

A. Sengul, E. Escobar, C. Jackevicius
{"title":"Evidence-based Appraisal of the DAPA-HF Trial","authors":"A. Sengul, E. Escobar, C. Jackevicius","doi":"10.37901/jcphp20-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient (HF) pg/mL AFib/flutter) standard HF (ICD, CRT, or both) and standard drug therapy (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), beta-blocker, unless contraindicated or not tolerated, with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use encouraged). Those with recent treatment with or intolerance to an SGLT2 inhibitor, T1DM, hypotension symptoms or SBP < 95 mmHg, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m 2 , or rapidly declining renal function were excluded. Citation: McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1995-2008. The DAPA-HF trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction regardless of the presence of diabetes. It was an international, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled study, with blinding of patients and all study personnel, a low percent of patients without final outcomes, and analyzed with the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcome of the trial showed an absolute risk reduction of 4.9% and a relative risk reduction of 23.2%, with an NNT of 20, demonstrating that the composite outcome of worsening heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes was lower in the dapagliflozin group relative to placebo. Dapagliflozin was well tolerated with notable adverse reactions reported being volume depletion and renal adverse events in a similar number of events for both groups, and severe renal adverse events being lower with dapagliflozin. There are limitations when considering the generalizability of this study since the majority of the study population were classified as moderate heart failure. Additionally, the study demonstrated that there is a differential benefit between NYHA classes, with the primary benefit attributed to those classified as NYHA FC II. The ideal population for treatment with dapagliflozin are adults with HF with reduced ejection fraction and NYHA FC II-III symptoms, who are receiving standard HF device therapy (ICD, CRT or both) and standard drug therapy (ACEi/ARB/ARNI and beta-blocker unless contraindicated or resulting in unacceptable side effects), with MRA use being encouraged.","PeriodicalId":15502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37901/jcphp20-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient (HF) pg/mL AFib/flutter) standard HF (ICD, CRT, or both) and standard drug therapy (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), beta-blocker, unless contraindicated or not tolerated, with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use encouraged). Those with recent treatment with or intolerance to an SGLT2 inhibitor, T1DM, hypotension symptoms or SBP < 95 mmHg, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m 2 , or rapidly declining renal function were excluded. Citation: McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1995-2008. The DAPA-HF trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction regardless of the presence of diabetes. It was an international, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled study, with blinding of patients and all study personnel, a low percent of patients without final outcomes, and analyzed with the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcome of the trial showed an absolute risk reduction of 4.9% and a relative risk reduction of 23.2%, with an NNT of 20, demonstrating that the composite outcome of worsening heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes was lower in the dapagliflozin group relative to placebo. Dapagliflozin was well tolerated with notable adverse reactions reported being volume depletion and renal adverse events in a similar number of events for both groups, and severe renal adverse events being lower with dapagliflozin. There are limitations when considering the generalizability of this study since the majority of the study population were classified as moderate heart failure. Additionally, the study demonstrated that there is a differential benefit between NYHA classes, with the primary benefit attributed to those classified as NYHA FC II. The ideal population for treatment with dapagliflozin are adults with HF with reduced ejection fraction and NYHA FC II-III symptoms, who are receiving standard HF device therapy (ICD, CRT or both) and standard drug therapy (ACEi/ARB/ARNI and beta-blocker unless contraindicated or resulting in unacceptable side effects), with MRA use being encouraged.
DAPA-HF审判的循证评价
患者(HF) pg/mL AFib/扑动)标准HF (ICD, CRT,或两者兼有)和标准药物治疗(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi),血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)或血管紧张素受体nepryysin抑制剂(ARNI), β受体阻滞剂,除非禁忌或不耐受,鼓励使用矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA))。排除了近期接受SGLT2抑制剂治疗或对SGLT2抑制剂不耐受、T1DM、低血压症状或收缩压< 95 mmHg、eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m3 / 2或肾功能迅速下降的患者。引用本文:McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE等。达格列净在心力衰竭和射血分数降低患者中的作用。中华医学杂志,2019;31(1):1995-2008。DAPA-HF试验评估了达格列净治疗射血分数降低的HF患者的安全性和有效性,无论是否存在糖尿病。这是一项国际、多中心、随机、安慰剂对照的研究,对患者和所有研究人员进行盲法研究,低百分比的患者没有最终结果,并根据意向治疗原则进行分析。试验的主要结局显示绝对风险降低了4.9%,相对风险降低了23.2%,NNT为20,表明达格列净组的心力衰竭恶化或心血管原因死亡的复合结局相对于安慰剂更低。达格列净耐受性良好,值得注意的不良反应是两组的容量减少和肾脏不良事件数量相似,达格列净的严重肾脏不良事件较低。考虑到这项研究的普遍性存在局限性,因为大多数研究人群被归类为中度心力衰竭。此外,该研究表明,不同类别的NYHA有不同的益处,主要益处归因于那些被归类为NYHA FC II的人。达格列净治疗的理想人群是有射血分数降低和NYHA FC II-III症状的HF成人,他们正在接受标准的HF装置治疗(ICD, CRT或两者兼有)和标准药物治疗(ACEi/ARB/ARNI和β受体阻滞剂,除非禁忌或导致不可接受的副作用),并鼓励使用MRA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信