Is working from home the new workplace panacea? Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for the future world of work

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
J. D. De Klerk, Mandi Joubert, Hendrikjan F. Mosca
{"title":"Is working from home the new workplace panacea? Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for the future world of work","authors":"J. D. De Klerk, Mandi Joubert, Hendrikjan F. Mosca","doi":"10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orientation The COVID-19 pandemic has forced millions of employees to work from home as governments implemented lockdowns. Research purpose This study examined the impact of working exclusively from home on employee engagement and experience, and determined beneficial and distracting factors. Motivation for the study Remote working trends have risen steeply since the onset of COVID-19 and are unlikely to taper off soon. Organisations need to understand the impact of remote work when reconsidering working arrangements. Research approach/design and method A dual-approach qualitative design was followed. The sample comprised 25 employees (N = 25) who were forced to work exclusively from home during COVID-19. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Main findings Working from home for protracted periods rendered paradoxical outcomes. Employees could work effectively with improved employee engagement and experience, but there were challenges rendering adverse effects. The experienced benefits of working from home created expectations that this practice would continue in future, along with some office work. Practical/managerial implications Organisations need to continue, though not exclusively, with work-from-home arrangements. The ideal ratio of remote work to office work was seen as two to three days per week. However, support and cultural practices would have to be put in place. Contribution/value-add The COVID-19 lockdown provided a unique environment to study remote work. For the first time, employees and organisations were placed in a situation where they could experience working from home in a stark and compulsory form, devoid of idealistic fantasies or romanticism.","PeriodicalId":47235,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Orientation The COVID-19 pandemic has forced millions of employees to work from home as governments implemented lockdowns. Research purpose This study examined the impact of working exclusively from home on employee engagement and experience, and determined beneficial and distracting factors. Motivation for the study Remote working trends have risen steeply since the onset of COVID-19 and are unlikely to taper off soon. Organisations need to understand the impact of remote work when reconsidering working arrangements. Research approach/design and method A dual-approach qualitative design was followed. The sample comprised 25 employees (N = 25) who were forced to work exclusively from home during COVID-19. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Main findings Working from home for protracted periods rendered paradoxical outcomes. Employees could work effectively with improved employee engagement and experience, but there were challenges rendering adverse effects. The experienced benefits of working from home created expectations that this practice would continue in future, along with some office work. Practical/managerial implications Organisations need to continue, though not exclusively, with work-from-home arrangements. The ideal ratio of remote work to office work was seen as two to three days per week. However, support and cultural practices would have to be put in place. Contribution/value-add The COVID-19 lockdown provided a unique environment to study remote work. For the first time, employees and organisations were placed in a situation where they could experience working from home in a stark and compulsory form, devoid of idealistic fantasies or romanticism.
在家办公是新的职场灵丹妙药吗?2019冠状病毒病大流行对未来工作世界的教训
随着各国政府实施封锁,COVID-19大流行迫使数百万员工在家工作。研究目的本研究考察了完全在家工作对员工敬业度和体验的影响,并确定了有益和分散的因素。自新冠肺炎疫情爆发以来,远程办公趋势急剧上升,而且不太可能很快减弱。在重新考虑工作安排时,组织需要了解远程工作的影响。研究方法/设计与方法采用双方法定性设计。样本包括25名员工(N = 25),他们在COVID-19期间被迫完全在家工作。数据通过半结构化访谈收集。长期在家工作产生了矛盾的结果。通过提高员工的敬业度和经验,员工可以有效地工作,但也存在带来不利影响的挑战。在家工作的好处让人们期望这种做法会在未来继续下去,同时也会有一些办公室工作。实际/管理意义组织需要继续(尽管不是唯一的)在家工作的安排。远程工作与办公室工作的理想比例被认为是每周两到三天。然而,支持和文化实践必须到位。COVID-19封锁为研究远程工作提供了独特的环境。员工和组织第一次被置于这样一种境地:他们可以体验一种赤裸裸的、强制性的在家工作,没有理想主义的幻想或浪漫主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信