Analysis and Comparison of the Theoretical Model of the Relationship between Reading and Writing

Ediwarman Ediwarman, S. Syafrizal, J. Pahamzah
{"title":"Analysis and Comparison of the Theoretical Model of the Relationship between Reading and Writing","authors":"Ediwarman Ediwarman, S. Syafrizal, J. Pahamzah","doi":"10.26858/eralingua.v6i2.18975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study compares and evaluates three alternative theoretical models of the relevant writing relationships. The reading dimensions of this model include components of understanding of places and parts. Dimensions include components of spelling, vocabulary, word structure, and story structure. These models differ with respect to the order in which the dimensions of reading and writing are related. The interactive model allows the use of reading knowledge in writing, and vice versa. Other models (read-to-write; write-to-read) only allow knowledge to move in one direction. These models are evaluated based on the model. The ability to explain the relationships found in the extensive corpus of reading and collecting data from 256 second graders and 251 fourth graders. The interactive model fits the data better than the read-to-write model at the second grade level and the write-to-read model at both grade levels and the read-to-write model are superior to the write-to-write model.  Specific relationships are examined and pedagogical implications.Keywords: Analysis, Model Comparison, Reading, Writing.","PeriodicalId":33786,"journal":{"name":"Eralingua Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eralingua Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v6i2.18975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. This study compares and evaluates three alternative theoretical models of the relevant writing relationships. The reading dimensions of this model include components of understanding of places and parts. Dimensions include components of spelling, vocabulary, word structure, and story structure. These models differ with respect to the order in which the dimensions of reading and writing are related. The interactive model allows the use of reading knowledge in writing, and vice versa. Other models (read-to-write; write-to-read) only allow knowledge to move in one direction. These models are evaluated based on the model. The ability to explain the relationships found in the extensive corpus of reading and collecting data from 256 second graders and 251 fourth graders. The interactive model fits the data better than the read-to-write model at the second grade level and the write-to-read model at both grade levels and the read-to-write model are superior to the write-to-write model.  Specific relationships are examined and pedagogical implications.Keywords: Analysis, Model Comparison, Reading, Writing.
阅读与写作关系理论模型的分析与比较
摘要本研究比较并评价了三种可供选择的相关写作关系理论模型。该模型的阅读维度包括对地点和部分的理解。维度包括拼写、词汇、单词结构和故事结构的组成部分。这些模型在阅读和写作维度相关的顺序上有所不同。互动模式允许在写作中使用阅读知识,反之亦然。其他模式(读到写;写到读)只允许知识向一个方向移动。这些模型是基于该模型进行评估的。在阅读和收集256名二年级学生和251名四年级学生的数据的广泛语料库中发现的解释关系的能力。交互模型比二年级的读写模型更适合数据,两个年级的写读模型和读写模型都优于写写模型。研究了具体的关系和教学意义。关键词:分析,模型比较,阅读,写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书