Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in Children

Raihan Uddin, A. Jabbar, Shafiqur Rahman, Maooz Khan
{"title":"Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in Children","authors":"Raihan Uddin, A. Jabbar, Shafiqur Rahman, Maooz Khan","doi":"10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The LMA-ProSeal is a new laryngeal mask airway with a rear cuff and drainage tube that allows a higher seal pressure than the LMA-Classic for the same intra-cuff pressure and it permits drainage of gastric secretions and access to the alimentary tract. Objective: This study compared the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children for ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure and maintenance of airway. Materials and method: This comparative study was done during the period of January 2015 to December 2015 in BIRDEM Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Forty ASA 1-2 children undergoing circumcision, herniotomy and orchiopexy were included. The patients were randomly assigned to size 2.5 LMA-ProSeal or 2.5 LMA-Classic groups for airway management. We assessed success rates at first attempt of insertion, airway sealing pressure, maintenance of airway and postoperative complications. Results: There was no statistical difference between two groups for the success rates at first attempt of insertion and maintenance of airway but sealing pressure was significantly high in the LMA-ProSeal group. Regarding postoperative complication like injury to lip-teeth-tongue, blood staining and cough or laryngospasm were also not significant. Conclusion: We concluded that ease of insertion, maintenance of airway and risk of injury are similar between the LMA-ProSeal and the LMA-Classic in children. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2018 6(1): 18-21","PeriodicalId":53280,"journal":{"name":"Delta Medical College Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"18-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35963","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delta Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The LMA-ProSeal is a new laryngeal mask airway with a rear cuff and drainage tube that allows a higher seal pressure than the LMA-Classic for the same intra-cuff pressure and it permits drainage of gastric secretions and access to the alimentary tract. Objective: This study compared the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children for ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure and maintenance of airway. Materials and method: This comparative study was done during the period of January 2015 to December 2015 in BIRDEM Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Forty ASA 1-2 children undergoing circumcision, herniotomy and orchiopexy were included. The patients were randomly assigned to size 2.5 LMA-ProSeal or 2.5 LMA-Classic groups for airway management. We assessed success rates at first attempt of insertion, airway sealing pressure, maintenance of airway and postoperative complications. Results: There was no statistical difference between two groups for the success rates at first attempt of insertion and maintenance of airway but sealing pressure was significantly high in the LMA-ProSeal group. Regarding postoperative complication like injury to lip-teeth-tongue, blood staining and cough or laryngospasm were also not significant. Conclusion: We concluded that ease of insertion, maintenance of airway and risk of injury are similar between the LMA-ProSeal and the LMA-Classic in children. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2018 6(1): 18-21
儿童LMA-ProSeal与LMA-Classic的比较
背景:LMA ProSeal是一种新型喉罩气道,具有后袖带和引流管,在相同的袖带内压力下,其密封压力比LMA Classic更高,并且可以排出胃分泌物并进入消化道。目的:本研究比较了LMA ProSeal和LMA Classic在儿童中的易插入性、气道密封压力和气道维护方面的作用。材料和方法:本比较研究于2015年1月至2015年12月在孟加拉国达卡的BIRDEM医院进行。40名ASA 1-2儿童接受了包皮环切术、疝修补术和睾丸切除术。患者被随机分配到尺寸为2.5 LMA ProSeal或2.5 LMA Classic组进行气道管理。我们评估了首次插入的成功率、气道密封压力、气道维持和术后并发症。结果:两组首次尝试插入和维持气道的成功率没有统计学差异,但LMA ProSeal组的密封压力显著较高。术后并发症如唇、牙、舌损伤、血染、咳嗽或喉痉挛也不显著。结论:我们得出的结论是,在儿童中,LMA ProSeal和LMA Classic的插入、气道维持和损伤风险相似。德尔塔医学杂志2018年1月6(1):18-21
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信