Craniophenetic Features of Cis-Kuban Population of the Early Iron Age (Preliminary Data)

Alexandra Abramova
{"title":"Craniophenetic Features of Cis-Kuban Population of the Early Iron Age (Preliminary Data)","authors":"Alexandra Abramova","doi":"10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2021.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was based on the material of two anthropological series originating from the territory of the kurgan cemetery sites at Volna 1 and the Starokorsunskaya settlement 2. Volna 1 is located 10 km from the village of Taman, and according to archaeologists, it could have been a previously unknown Greek Apoykia. To this date, the excavations of the monument have been fully completed, which gives us the opportunity to speak with confidence that 6th–2nd centuries BC is the period it dates back to. The second kurgan cemetery we examined belongs to Starokorsunskaya settlement No. 2 located 6 km from the village. The settlement and the adjacent necropolis have been studied by the Krasnodar archaeological expedition for almost 35 years, as a result we have an extensive anthropological collection, and a part of it became the subject of our study. The monument dates back to the period of 6th century BC – 3rd century AD and is considered to be a reference one of the largest Meotian settlements in the Kuban region. Both sites are characterized by poor preservation of bone tissue and strong skeletons fragmentation. In spite of that, we used the craniophenetic program and studied 81 skulls obtained during excavations of Volna 1 and 60 skulls from the Starokorsunskaya settlement. As a result of pairwise intragroup comparison using the chi-square of the two population groups of Volna 1 6th–4th centuries BC and 4th–2nd centuries BC we cannot speak of a statistically significant difference. When comparing the two sample population groups from Volna 1 and the Meots from the Starokorsunskaya settlement No. 2, a high similarity of the inhabitants of the Black Sea territories with the Meotes from the Kuban region was noted. Probably, this allows us to assume predominance of Meotian groups in Volna 1 population.","PeriodicalId":34663,"journal":{"name":"Nizhnevolzhskii arkheologicheskii vestnik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nizhnevolzhskii arkheologicheskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2021.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was based on the material of two anthropological series originating from the territory of the kurgan cemetery sites at Volna 1 and the Starokorsunskaya settlement 2. Volna 1 is located 10 km from the village of Taman, and according to archaeologists, it could have been a previously unknown Greek Apoykia. To this date, the excavations of the monument have been fully completed, which gives us the opportunity to speak with confidence that 6th–2nd centuries BC is the period it dates back to. The second kurgan cemetery we examined belongs to Starokorsunskaya settlement No. 2 located 6 km from the village. The settlement and the adjacent necropolis have been studied by the Krasnodar archaeological expedition for almost 35 years, as a result we have an extensive anthropological collection, and a part of it became the subject of our study. The monument dates back to the period of 6th century BC – 3rd century AD and is considered to be a reference one of the largest Meotian settlements in the Kuban region. Both sites are characterized by poor preservation of bone tissue and strong skeletons fragmentation. In spite of that, we used the craniophenetic program and studied 81 skulls obtained during excavations of Volna 1 and 60 skulls from the Starokorsunskaya settlement. As a result of pairwise intragroup comparison using the chi-square of the two population groups of Volna 1 6th–4th centuries BC and 4th–2nd centuries BC we cannot speak of a statistically significant difference. When comparing the two sample population groups from Volna 1 and the Meots from the Starokorsunskaya settlement No. 2, a high similarity of the inhabitants of the Black Sea territories with the Meotes from the Kuban region was noted. Probably, this allows us to assume predominance of Meotian groups in Volna 1 population.
铁器时代早期Cis-Kuban群体的颅骨henetic特征(初步数据)
这项研究基于两个人类学系列的材料,这两个系列起源于沃尔纳1号库尔干墓地和Starokorsunskaya定居点2。沃尔纳1号距离塔曼村10公里,根据考古学家的说法,它可能是一个以前不为人知的希腊Apoykia。到目前为止,纪念碑的挖掘工作已经完全完成,这让我们有机会满怀信心地说,公元前6世纪至2世纪是它可以追溯到的时期。我们检查的第二个库尔干墓地属于距离村庄6公里的Starokorsunskaya 2号定居点。克拉斯诺达尔考古探险队对该定居点和邻近的墓地进行了近35年的研究,因此我们拥有大量的人类学藏品,其中一部分成为我们研究的主题。该纪念碑可追溯到公元前6世纪至公元3世纪,被认为是库班地区最大的Meotian定居点之一。这两个部位都具有骨组织保存不良和骨骼碎裂强烈的特点。尽管如此,我们还是使用了颅盖遗传学程序,研究了在挖掘Volna 1期间获得的81个头骨和Starokorsunskaya定居点的60个头骨。由于使用公元前1 6–4世纪和公元前4–2世纪沃尔纳两个人口群体的卡方进行了成对的组内比较,我们无法得出统计上的显著差异。当比较来自Volna 1的两个样本种群和来自Starokorsunskaya 2号定居点的Meots时,注意到黑海地区的居民与来自Kuban地区的Meotes非常相似。也许,这使我们能够假设在Volna 1人群中Meotian群体占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nizhnevolzhskii arkheologicheskii vestnik
Nizhnevolzhskii arkheologicheskii vestnik Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信