A idade reflete o domínio linguístico? Efeito das medidas de desempenho na análise de dados em aquisição fonológica / Does age reflect language mastery? Effect of performance measures in the analysis of phonological data

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Andressa Toni, Raquel Santana Santos
{"title":"A idade reflete o domínio linguístico? Efeito das medidas de desempenho na análise de dados em aquisição fonológica / Does age reflect language mastery? Effect of performance measures in the analysis of phonological data","authors":"Andressa Toni, Raquel Santana Santos","doi":"10.17851/2237-2083.30.1.376-424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines two types of data organization criteria for intersubject comparison in phonological acquisition: Age Group, which is widely applied for intersubject comparison, and Performance in the Task, which compares subjetcs ́ performance taking into account the percentage of answers in accordance with the adult production. We argue that a criterion for performance must take into account the performance in the phenomena analysed, since the linguistic development is not homogeneous. We compare here the results obtained by applying both criteria in the analysis of the voicing of alveolar fricatives in coda and the syllabic attack branching. It is shown that Performance in the Task promotes greater consistency than the Age Group in the organization of groups, both neutralizing individual differences observed in children’s linguistic development, and revealing congruent patterns in the use of repair strategies. With these results, we suggest that Performance in the Task is more effective than chronological measures for the organization, analysis and interpretation of data in language acquisition studies.","PeriodicalId":42188,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudos da Linguagem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudos da Linguagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.30.1.376-424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines two types of data organization criteria for intersubject comparison in phonological acquisition: Age Group, which is widely applied for intersubject comparison, and Performance in the Task, which compares subjetcs ́ performance taking into account the percentage of answers in accordance with the adult production. We argue that a criterion for performance must take into account the performance in the phenomena analysed, since the linguistic development is not homogeneous. We compare here the results obtained by applying both criteria in the analysis of the voicing of alveolar fricatives in coda and the syllabic attack branching. It is shown that Performance in the Task promotes greater consistency than the Age Group in the organization of groups, both neutralizing individual differences observed in children’s linguistic development, and revealing congruent patterns in the use of repair strategies. With these results, we suggest that Performance in the Task is more effective than chronological measures for the organization, analysis and interpretation of data in language acquisition studies.
年龄是否反映了语言能力?性能测量对语音习得数据分析的影响/年龄是否反映了语言掌握?音系数据分析中性能指标的影响
本文考察了语音习得中主体间比较的两种类型的数据组织标准:年龄组,它被广泛应用于主体间比较,以及任务中的表现,它根据成年人的产出,在考虑回答百分比的情况下,比较子任务的表现。我们认为,表现的标准必须考虑所分析现象的表现,因为语言的发展是不同质的。在这里,我们比较了将这两个标准应用于尾音中肺泡摩擦音的发音分析和音节攻击分支的结果。研究表明,在小组组织中,任务表现比年龄组更能促进一致性,既能消除儿童语言发展中观察到的个体差异,又能揭示修复策略使用的一致模式。根据这些结果,我们认为在语言习得研究中,在组织、分析和解释数据方面,任务表现比按时间顺序衡量更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信