Attributional profiles: Considering multiple causal attributions for success and failure at the beginning of secondary school

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Pauline M. Zuidema , Lisette Hornstra , Jaap Schuitema , Astrid M.G. Poorthuis
{"title":"Attributional profiles: Considering multiple causal attributions for success and failure at the beginning of secondary school","authors":"Pauline M. Zuidema ,&nbsp;Lisette Hornstra ,&nbsp;Jaap Schuitema ,&nbsp;Astrid M.G. Poorthuis","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Students typically perceive their successes and failures to have multiple causes. The present study examined students’ profiles of causal attributions for success and failure during the first year of secondary school. The stability of attributional profile membership was assessed across three timepoints. Furthermore, it was examined whether students characterized by different attribution profiles differed in their levels of school engagement, self-esteem, and school performance. Latent profile analyses and latent transition analyses among 657 first-year Dutch secondary school students (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 12.6, <em>SD</em> = 0.4) identified four attributional profiles, which were similar across the three timepoints. The profiles were labelled <em>uncontrollable failure, controllable failure, uncontrollable success, and undifferentiated</em>. About half of the students (52 %) remained member of the same profile across the three timepoints. Students in the <em>uncontrollable success</em> profile reported significantly lower levels of school engagement and self-esteem, and performed less well in school compared to students in the other profiles. Students in the <em>uncontrollable failure</em> profile and the <em>controllable failure</em> profile did not differ from each other with regard to school engagement, self-esteem, and school performance. The findings suggest that attributional retraining interventions may want to shift their focus from changing uncontrollable failure attributions to changing students’ external, uncontrollable attributions for success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000188","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students typically perceive their successes and failures to have multiple causes. The present study examined students’ profiles of causal attributions for success and failure during the first year of secondary school. The stability of attributional profile membership was assessed across three timepoints. Furthermore, it was examined whether students characterized by different attribution profiles differed in their levels of school engagement, self-esteem, and school performance. Latent profile analyses and latent transition analyses among 657 first-year Dutch secondary school students (Mage = 12.6, SD = 0.4) identified four attributional profiles, which were similar across the three timepoints. The profiles were labelled uncontrollable failure, controllable failure, uncontrollable success, and undifferentiated. About half of the students (52 %) remained member of the same profile across the three timepoints. Students in the uncontrollable success profile reported significantly lower levels of school engagement and self-esteem, and performed less well in school compared to students in the other profiles. Students in the uncontrollable failure profile and the controllable failure profile did not differ from each other with regard to school engagement, self-esteem, and school performance. The findings suggest that attributional retraining interventions may want to shift their focus from changing uncontrollable failure attributions to changing students’ external, uncontrollable attributions for success.

归因概况:考虑中学初期成功与失败的多重因果归因
学生们通常认为他们的成功和失败有多种原因。本研究考察了中学一年级学生对成功和失败的因果归因。在三个时间点上评估归因剖面隶属度的稳定性。此外,研究还考察了具有不同归因特征的学生在学校投入、自尊和学校表现水平上是否存在差异。对657名荷兰一年级中学生(Mage = 12.6, SD = 0.4)的潜在特征分析和潜在转变分析发现,在三个时间点上,四种归因特征具有相似性。这些特征被标记为不可控失败、可控失败、不可控成功和未区分。大约一半的学生(52%)在三个时间点上保持了相同的状态。与其他类型的学生相比,不可控成功类型的学生在学校的参与度和自尊水平明显较低,在学校的表现也较差。不可控失败组和可控失败组的学生在学校投入、自尊和学校表现方面没有差异。研究结果表明,归因再训练干预可能需要将其重点从改变不可控的失败归因转向改变学生的外部、不可控的成功归因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信