Know Means Know: Using Radical Empathy to Define Consent in Digital Archiving

IF 0.6 4区管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Serials Review Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI:10.1080/00987913.2022.2110851

Sophie S. Hollis

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract As many archives increase digital access to their holdings, there is a need for a clear policy on how institutions can ethically include sexual materials in digital collections. These materials are vital to building inclusive collections, but they also deserve special consideration in balancing access with privacy. Such materials, particularly those with reference to sexual or gender-based violence, deserve a specific ethical framework because of their unique ability to cause continued harm to both subjects and users. This paper proposes the application of the radical empathy framework developed by Michelle Caswell and Marika Cifor (2016) to determine consent to digitize the materials and discusses some examples where this framework might apply.

查看原文本刊更多论文

知道意味着知道：在数字存档中使用激进的同理心来定义同意

随着许多档案馆增加对其馆藏的数字化访问，有必要制定一个明确的政策，规定机构如何在道德上将性材料纳入数字馆藏。这些材料对于建立包容性的收藏是至关重要的，但在平衡访问和隐私方面也值得特别考虑。这类材料，特别是涉及性暴力或基于性别的暴力的材料，应该有一个具体的道德框架，因为它们具有对对象和使用者造成持续伤害的独特能力。本文提出应用Michelle Caswell和Marika Cifor(2016)开发的激进移情框架来确定对数字化材料的同意，并讨论了该框架可能适用的一些例子。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Serials Review INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Serials Review, issued quarterly, is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal for the international serials community. Articles focus on serials in the broadest sense of the term and cover all aspects of serials information; regular columns feature interviews, exchanges on controversial topics, book reviews, and conference reports. The journal encompasses practical, theoretical, and visionary ideas for librarians, publishers, vendors, and anyone interested in the changing nature of serials. Serials Review covers all aspects of serials management: format considerations, publishing models, statistical studies, collection analysis, collaborative efforts, reference and access issues, cataloging and acquisitions, people who have shaped the serials community, and topical bibliographic studies.