Development of Teaching Materials on Learning Economic Models to Improve Students’ Cognitive Achievement

Zuhri Saputra Hutabarat, Ekawarna Ekawarna
{"title":"Development of Teaching Materials on Learning Economic Models to Improve Students’ Cognitive Achievement","authors":"Zuhri Saputra Hutabarat, Ekawarna Ekawarna","doi":"10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.1679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this research are to both produce products of teaching materials of Learning Economic Models and find their effects towards students’ cognitive achievement. Dick and Carey’s model was used for the concept of the development model. Formative tests were used to measure the effectiveness of teaching materials-and they were used to test one evaluation, small group evaluation, and field trial. The data collected was analyzed through mean, standard deviation, and z-test statistics. The research showed the products of teaching materials, with all being covered from Chapter 1 through Chapter 8 in order: 1) the theory of teaching and learning, 2) the basic concept learning models, 3) science-based learning models, 4) innovative learning models, 5) cooperative and collaborative learning models, 6) a model of problem-based learning, 7) contextual-based learning models, and 8) integrated learning models. The findings revealed that students with the teaching materials performed better than those without. The null hypothesis was tested at a 0.05 level of significance, indicating a significant difference between the cognitive achievement scores of those taught with the teaching materials and those taught without.","PeriodicalId":32470,"journal":{"name":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.1679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to both produce products of teaching materials of Learning Economic Models and find their effects towards students’ cognitive achievement. Dick and Carey’s model was used for the concept of the development model. Formative tests were used to measure the effectiveness of teaching materials-and they were used to test one evaluation, small group evaluation, and field trial. The data collected was analyzed through mean, standard deviation, and z-test statistics. The research showed the products of teaching materials, with all being covered from Chapter 1 through Chapter 8 in order: 1) the theory of teaching and learning, 2) the basic concept learning models, 3) science-based learning models, 4) innovative learning models, 5) cooperative and collaborative learning models, 6) a model of problem-based learning, 7) contextual-based learning models, and 8) integrated learning models. The findings revealed that students with the teaching materials performed better than those without. The null hypothesis was tested at a 0.05 level of significance, indicating a significant difference between the cognitive achievement scores of those taught with the teaching materials and those taught without.
开发《学习经济模型》教材提高学生认知成就
本研究的目的是生产《学习经济模型》教材的产品,并发现其对学生认知成就的影响。Dick和Carey的模型被用于开发模型的概念。形成性测试被用来衡量教材的有效性,它们被用来测试一次评估、小组评估和实地试验。收集的数据通过均值、标准差和z检验统计量进行分析。研究展示了教材的成果,从第一章到第八章依次为:1)教与学理论,2)基本概念学习模式,3)基于科学的学习模式,4)创新学习模式,5)合作与协作学习模式,6)基于问题的学习模式,7)基于情境的学习模式,8)整合学习模式。研究结果显示,有教材的学生比没有教材的学生表现得更好。零假设在0.05的显著性水平上进行检验,表明使用教材教学的学生与未使用教材教学的学生的认知成就得分有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
407
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信