Caught Unprepared: Consequences of Getting Full Online During a Pandemic Autori:

Q2 Social Sciences
Aykut Arslan, S. Yener, F. Korkmaz, U. Alola
{"title":"Caught Unprepared: Consequences of Getting Full Online During a Pandemic Autori:","authors":"Aykut Arslan, S. Yener, F. Korkmaz, U. Alola","doi":"10.33788/rcis.77.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the concept of remote working is not new, and it has been in use for a while, billions of people and workplaces were caught in surprise during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to full-scale lockdowns people got stuck with their family members. And in a very short time they were expected to set up home-offices and continue working. Balancing family relations with daily work schedule was hard for many. Drawing on a sample of instructors, this study investigates how people felt and dealt with it. Homogeneous purposive sampling technique was employed. The authors contacted with people from their network and asked them to fill in the online questionnaires. The people contacted also help to reach others in their network and consequently a total of 435 people participated. Most of the sample is comprised of university instructors (44.4%); followed by secondary school (22.8%), primary school (18.6%), and high school teachers (14.3%). We developed a theoretical model based on boundary theory and study the relationships among eWork-Life interferences with technostress and psychological well-being. The results supported our hypotheses and we found that timely IT assistance might decrease the felt technostress. Implications and further study suggestions are made accordingly.","PeriodicalId":45087,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.77.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the concept of remote working is not new, and it has been in use for a while, billions of people and workplaces were caught in surprise during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to full-scale lockdowns people got stuck with their family members. And in a very short time they were expected to set up home-offices and continue working. Balancing family relations with daily work schedule was hard for many. Drawing on a sample of instructors, this study investigates how people felt and dealt with it. Homogeneous purposive sampling technique was employed. The authors contacted with people from their network and asked them to fill in the online questionnaires. The people contacted also help to reach others in their network and consequently a total of 435 people participated. Most of the sample is comprised of university instructors (44.4%); followed by secondary school (22.8%), primary school (18.6%), and high school teachers (14.3%). We developed a theoretical model based on boundary theory and study the relationships among eWork-Life interferences with technostress and psychological well-being. The results supported our hypotheses and we found that timely IT assistance might decrease the felt technostress. Implications and further study suggestions are made accordingly.
措手不及:在大流行病期间全面上网的后果:
尽管远程工作的概念并不新鲜,而且已经使用了一段时间,但在新冠肺炎大流行期间,数十亿人和工作场所感到惊讶。由于全面封锁,人们不得不和家人呆在一起。预计他们将在很短的时间内建立家庭办公室并继续工作。对许多人来说,平衡家庭关系和日常工作安排很困难。本研究以教师为样本,调查人们的感受和处理方式。采用同质目的抽样技术。作者联系了他们网络中的人,并要求他们填写在线问卷。联系的人还帮助联系他们网络中的其他人,因此共有435人参与。大部分样本由大学教师组成(44.4%);其次是中学(22.8%)、小学(18.6%)和高中教师(14.3%)。我们建立了一个基于边界理论的理论模型,研究了电子工作生活干扰与技术压力和心理健康之间的关系。研究结果支持了我们的假设,我们发现及时的IT援助可能会减轻技术压力。并提出了相应的启示和进一步的研究建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala
Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信