“Mystery” in the Wisdom of Solomon and 4QInstruction

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION

Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1177/09518207211033522

Benjamin G. Wold

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Similar ideas and tropes found in the Wisdom of Solomon and 4QInstruction (4Q415–418, 423; 1Q26) have considerable significance for the study of early Jewish sapiential literature. One feature shared by both compositions is teaching about “mysteries.” Previous studies on these two wisdom writings conclude that there are distinct differences in what these mysteries are and how they function in the thought world of each composition. This article argues for an alternative understanding of mysteries in 4QInstruction to those presented in previous comparative studies. In light of this reassessment of mysteries, the Wisdom of Solomon and 4QInstruction are seen to participate within an intellectual space much closer to one another than previously perceived.

查看原文本刊更多论文

所罗门智慧中的“奥秘”与4Q建构

在《所罗门的智慧》和《第四次建构》（4Q415–418423；1Q26）中发现的类似思想和比喻对早期犹太智慧文学的研究具有相当重要的意义。这两篇作文的一个共同特点是教授“奥秘”。之前对这两篇智慧著作的研究得出结论，这些奥秘是什么以及它们在每篇作文的思想世界中的作用有着明显的差异。本文主张对4Q结构中的奥秘有一种不同于以往比较研究的理解。鉴于对奥秘的重新评估，所罗门的智慧和4Q构造被认为是在一个比以前感知的更接近彼此的知识空间中参与的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The last twenty years have witnessed some remarkable achievements in the study of early Jewish literature. Given the ever-increasing number and availability of primary sources for these writings, specialists have been producing text-critical, historical, social scientific, and theological studies which, in turn, have fuelled a growing interest among scholars, students, religious leaders, and the wider public. The only English journal of its kind, Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha was founded in 1987 to provide a much-needed forum for scholars to discuss and review most recent developments in this burgeoning field in the academy.