How social media self-efficacy and social anxiety affect customer purchasing from agile brands on social media

IF 9.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sıddık Bozkurt, D. Gligor, Jennifer A. Locander, Raouf Ahmad Rather
{"title":"How social media self-efficacy and social anxiety affect customer purchasing from agile brands on social media","authors":"Sıddık Bozkurt, D. Gligor, Jennifer A. Locander, Raouf Ahmad Rather","doi":"10.1108/jrim-08-2022-0242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to contribute to the social media agility literature by examining the impact of perceived social media agility on customer purchases. More specifically, this study seeks to reveal whether perceived social media agility positively affects customer purchases. Furthermore, this study examines the moderating roles of social media self-efficacy and social anxiety to increase the model's explanatory power. That is, this study investigates whether social media self-efficacy positively moderates the impact of perceived social media agility on customer purchases. Similarly, this study examines whether social anxiety negatively moderates the impact of perceived social media agility on customer purchases.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted on Qualtrics platforms to test the research hypotheses. To test the main effect, a linear regression was used. To test moderating relationships, PROCESS Macro Model 1 was used. Finally, the moderating effects were probed with the Johnson–Neyman technique to gain further insights into the interaction effects.FindingsThe study results show that when customers perceive a brand as agile on social media platforms, they are more willing to buy the goods/services of the brand. Notably, individuals who are high on social media self-efficacy (relative to low on it) display more willingness to purchase the brand's products/services. However, customers who are high on social anxiety (relative to low on it) are less willing to purchase the brand's products/services.Originality/valueThis study examines the effect of perceived social media agility on customer purchases while accounting for the moderating role of perceived social media self-efficacy and social anxiety. The results provide noteworthy theoretical and managerial contributions.","PeriodicalId":47116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-08-2022-0242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to contribute to the social media agility literature by examining the impact of perceived social media agility on customer purchases. More specifically, this study seeks to reveal whether perceived social media agility positively affects customer purchases. Furthermore, this study examines the moderating roles of social media self-efficacy and social anxiety to increase the model's explanatory power. That is, this study investigates whether social media self-efficacy positively moderates the impact of perceived social media agility on customer purchases. Similarly, this study examines whether social anxiety negatively moderates the impact of perceived social media agility on customer purchases.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted on Qualtrics platforms to test the research hypotheses. To test the main effect, a linear regression was used. To test moderating relationships, PROCESS Macro Model 1 was used. Finally, the moderating effects were probed with the Johnson–Neyman technique to gain further insights into the interaction effects.FindingsThe study results show that when customers perceive a brand as agile on social media platforms, they are more willing to buy the goods/services of the brand. Notably, individuals who are high on social media self-efficacy (relative to low on it) display more willingness to purchase the brand's products/services. However, customers who are high on social anxiety (relative to low on it) are less willing to purchase the brand's products/services.Originality/valueThis study examines the effect of perceived social media agility on customer purchases while accounting for the moderating role of perceived social media self-efficacy and social anxiety. The results provide noteworthy theoretical and managerial contributions.
社交媒体自我效能感和社交焦虑如何影响客户在社交媒体上购买敏捷品牌
目的本研究旨在通过考察感知的社交媒体敏捷性对客户购买的影响,为社交媒体敏捷度文献做出贡献。更具体地说,这项研究试图揭示感知到的社交媒体灵活性是否会对客户购买产生积极影响。此外,本研究考察了社交媒体自我效能感和社交焦虑的调节作用,以提高模型的解释力。也就是说,本研究调查了社交媒体自我效能感是否正向调节感知社交媒体敏捷性对客户购买的影响。同样,这项研究考察了社交焦虑是否会对感知到的社交媒体敏捷性对客户购买的影响产生负面影响。设计/方法/方法在Qualtrics平台上进行了一项在线调查,以检验研究假设。为了检验主要影响,使用了线性回归。为了测试调节关系,使用了PROCESS宏模型1。最后,用Johnson–Neyman技术探讨了调节效应,以进一步深入了解相互作用效应。研究结果表明,当客户在社交媒体平台上认为一个品牌敏捷时,他们更愿意购买该品牌的商品/服务。值得注意的是,社交媒体自我效能感较高(相对于较低)的个人更愿意购买品牌的产品/服务。然而,社交焦虑程度高(相对于社交焦虑程度低)的客户不太愿意购买该品牌的产品/服务。原创性/价值本研究考察了感知社交媒体灵活性对客户购买的影响,同时考虑了感知社交媒体自我效能和社交焦虑的调节作用。研究结果提供了值得注意的理论和管理贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing is to address substantive issues in interactive, relationship, electronic, direct and multi-channel marketing and marketing management. ISSN: 2040-7122 eISSN: 2040-7122 With its origins in the discipline and practice of direct marketing, the Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing (JRIM) aims to publish progressive, innovative and rigorous scholarly research for marketing academics and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信