Kolb's learning style analysis in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students

Nengah Nitriani, Darsikin Darsikin, S. Saehana
{"title":"Kolb's learning style analysis in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students","authors":"Nengah Nitriani, Darsikin Darsikin, S. Saehana","doi":"10.21067/mpej.v6i1.5593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research are second semester students who have joined the Basic Physics course for Archimedes' Principle, amounting to 46 people. The instrument used was a Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) questionnaire, which consisted of 40 statement items, 8 essay questions about HOTS, and interview guidelines. Based on the results of the study, it showed that from the maximum percentage (100%) in each Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) obtained the combination of diverger and assimilator learning styles as the highest average percentage (65.63%) in solving HOTS questions correctly compared to the other learning styles. It is followed by the accomodator (56.25%), the combination of assimilator and converger (54.17%), diverger (53.41%), assimilator (49.22%), and converger (48.61%). There are differences in Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students where students still experience errors in answering questions. The forms of incorrect answers given by students include: 1) Objects with a smaller surface area must be sink, 2) Heavy objects must be sink, 3) The amount of water affects the state of floating and sinking, 4) Hollow objects always float, and 5) Objects made of something hard must be sink. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the ability of prospective physics teacher students in solving HOTS questions must be trained by adjusting their learning styles.","PeriodicalId":32065,"journal":{"name":"Momentum Physics Education Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Momentum Physics Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v6i1.5593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students. This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. The subjects of this research are second semester students who have joined the Basic Physics course for Archimedes' Principle, amounting to 46 people. The instrument used was a Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) questionnaire, which consisted of 40 statement items, 8 essay questions about HOTS, and interview guidelines. Based on the results of the study, it showed that from the maximum percentage (100%) in each Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) obtained the combination of diverger and assimilator learning styles as the highest average percentage (65.63%) in solving HOTS questions correctly compared to the other learning styles. It is followed by the accomodator (56.25%), the combination of assimilator and converger (54.17%), diverger (53.41%), assimilator (49.22%), and converger (48.61%). There are differences in Kolb's Learning Style (KLS) in solving HOTS questions for prospective physics teacher students where students still experience errors in answering questions. The forms of incorrect answers given by students include: 1) Objects with a smaller surface area must be sink, 2) Heavy objects must be sink, 3) The amount of water affects the state of floating and sinking, 4) Hollow objects always float, and 5) Objects made of something hard must be sink. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the ability of prospective physics teacher students in solving HOTS questions must be trained by adjusting their learning styles.
未来物理教师学生解决HOTS问题的Kolb学习风格分析
本研究旨在分析准物理教师学生在解决HOTS问题时的Kolb学习风格(KLS)。本研究采用定性方法进行描述性研究。本次研究的对象是参加阿基米德原理基础物理课程的第二学期学生,共46人。使用的工具是科尔布学习风格(KLS)问卷,包括40个陈述题,8个关于HOTS的短文题和面试指南。根据研究结果,从各Kolb学习风格(KLS)中获得的最大百分比(100%)来看,与其他学习风格相比,发散型和同化型学习风格的组合在正确解决HOTS问题方面的平均百分比最高(65.63%)。其次是适应剂(56.25%)、同化剂和收敛剂的组合(54.17%)、发散剂(53.41%)、同化剂(49.22%)和收敛剂(48.61%)。未来物理教师学生在解决HOTS问题时的Kolb学习风格(KLS)存在差异,学生在回答问题时仍然存在错误。学生给出的错误答案形式有:1)表面积较小的物体一定是下沉的,2)较重的物体一定是下沉的,3)水量影响漂浮和下沉的状态,4)中空的物体总是漂浮的,5)坚硬的物体一定是下沉的。根据本研究的结果,可以得出结论,未来物理教师学生解决HOTS问题的能力必须通过调整他们的学习方式来培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信