Responses of soil heterotrophic respiration and microbial biomass to organic and conventional production systems

IF 2.1 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE
K. Dhakal, Madhav Parajuli, Siyang Jian, Jianwei Li, D. Nandwani
{"title":"Responses of soil heterotrophic respiration and microbial biomass to organic and conventional production systems","authors":"K. Dhakal, Madhav Parajuli, Siyang Jian, Jianwei Li, D. Nandwani","doi":"10.3389/fsoil.2022.999139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of organic and conventional production systems on crop productivity have been greatly explored, but their effects on soil microbial processes were often neglected. A comparative field study of organic and conventional production systems was conducted at the Tennessee State University research farm to determine soil heterotrophic respiration and microbial biomass carbon. Leafy green vegetables were grown in a conventional production system in an open field, and they were grown in an organic production system, using three different row covers (agribon cloth, insect net, and plastic), and in an open field. Soil samples (0-15cm) were collected from the two production systems. Soil heterotrophic respiration rate (RH), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and biomass-specific heterotrophic respiration rate (the inverse is used as a proxy for microbial carbon use efficiency) were quantified. The results showed that the conventional production system significantly increased RH relative to the organic system. Organic production system, however, significantly enhanced MBC and reduced biomass-specific respiration rate indicating an increase in carbon use efficiency. Although MBC remained unchanged among the row covers, insect net increased RH and biomass-specific heterotrophic respiration rate. Our results suggest that the organic production system not only promoted soil microbial abundance but also limited soil heterotrophic respiration to the atmosphere governed by the elevated carbon use efficiency.","PeriodicalId":73107,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in soil science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in soil science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2022.999139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The effects of organic and conventional production systems on crop productivity have been greatly explored, but their effects on soil microbial processes were often neglected. A comparative field study of organic and conventional production systems was conducted at the Tennessee State University research farm to determine soil heterotrophic respiration and microbial biomass carbon. Leafy green vegetables were grown in a conventional production system in an open field, and they were grown in an organic production system, using three different row covers (agribon cloth, insect net, and plastic), and in an open field. Soil samples (0-15cm) were collected from the two production systems. Soil heterotrophic respiration rate (RH), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and biomass-specific heterotrophic respiration rate (the inverse is used as a proxy for microbial carbon use efficiency) were quantified. The results showed that the conventional production system significantly increased RH relative to the organic system. Organic production system, however, significantly enhanced MBC and reduced biomass-specific respiration rate indicating an increase in carbon use efficiency. Although MBC remained unchanged among the row covers, insect net increased RH and biomass-specific heterotrophic respiration rate. Our results suggest that the organic production system not only promoted soil microbial abundance but also limited soil heterotrophic respiration to the atmosphere governed by the elevated carbon use efficiency.
土壤异养呼吸和微生物生物量对有机和常规生产系统的响应
有机生产系统和传统生产系统对作物生产力的影响已被广泛探讨,但它们对土壤微生物过程的影响往往被忽视。为了确定土壤异养呼吸和微生物生物量碳,在田纳西州立大学研究农场进行了有机和传统生产系统的田间比较研究。绿叶蔬菜在一个开放的田地里以传统的生产系统种植,它们在一个有机的生产系统中种植,使用三种不同的行盖(农业布、防虫网和塑料),在一个开放的田地里种植。从两个生产系统中采集土壤样品(0-15cm)。对土壤异养呼吸速率(RH)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)和生物量特异性异养呼吸速率(以反比作为微生物碳利用效率的代表)进行了量化。结果表明,相对于有机体系,常规生产体系显著提高了相对湿度。然而,有机生产系统显著提高了MBC,降低了生物量比呼吸速率,表明碳利用效率提高。虽然不同排盖间MBC保持不变,但虫网增加了相对湿度和生物量特异性异养呼吸速率。研究结果表明,有机生产系统不仅促进了土壤微生物的丰度,而且通过提高碳利用效率限制了土壤对大气的异养呼吸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信