Examining illicit networks in laboratory experiments with a preliminary focus on communication

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
David A. Neequaye, Pär Anders Granhag, Andreas Segerberg, Daniel Petterson
{"title":"Examining illicit networks in laboratory experiments with a preliminary focus on communication","authors":"David A. Neequaye,&nbsp;Pär Anders Granhag,&nbsp;Andreas Segerberg,&nbsp;Daniel Petterson","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This research introduces a web application, the bot orchestrator, to assist researchers in developing paradigms to examine illicit networks in experiments. We implemented the application and a new paradigm to create mock networks using strangers. The proof-of-concept experiment examined communication when networks plan illicit activities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants assumed the role of an illicit network member—either a manager, a coordinator or an executor. They held some information the group needed to accomplish either a material or ideological goal: communication between the roles was imperative for success. We also manipulated the level of risk associated with communicating about the planning activities. For half of the participants, there was a moderate risk of communicating about the plans. For the other half, the risk of such communication was high. The procedure allowed us to examine who a network member was willing to communicate with, given the goal under pursuit and the associated risk level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Although goal-type, risk level, and the Goal-type × Risk Interaction did not significantly predict communication decisions, a content analysis suggested that participants were attempting to navigate the risks while pursuing their goals. Participants employed diverse communication strategies: individual differences explained the most variance regarding how network members communicate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We hope the web application and paradigm this research introduces will facilitate further experiments examining illicit networks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.12230","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This research introduces a web application, the bot orchestrator, to assist researchers in developing paradigms to examine illicit networks in experiments. We implemented the application and a new paradigm to create mock networks using strangers. The proof-of-concept experiment examined communication when networks plan illicit activities.

Method

Participants assumed the role of an illicit network member—either a manager, a coordinator or an executor. They held some information the group needed to accomplish either a material or ideological goal: communication between the roles was imperative for success. We also manipulated the level of risk associated with communicating about the planning activities. For half of the participants, there was a moderate risk of communicating about the plans. For the other half, the risk of such communication was high. The procedure allowed us to examine who a network member was willing to communicate with, given the goal under pursuit and the associated risk level.

Results

Although goal-type, risk level, and the Goal-type × Risk Interaction did not significantly predict communication decisions, a content analysis suggested that participants were attempting to navigate the risks while pursuing their goals. Participants employed diverse communication strategies: individual differences explained the most variance regarding how network members communicate.

Conclusions

We hope the web application and paradigm this research introduces will facilitate further experiments examining illicit networks.

Abstract Image

在实验室实验中检查非法网络,初步侧重于通信
本研究介绍了一个网络应用程序,即bot编排器,以帮助研究人员在实验中开发范式来检查非法网络。我们实现了应用程序和一个使用陌生人创建模拟网络的新范例。概念验证实验检查了网络计划非法活动时的通信。方法参与者扮演一个非法网络成员的角色——管理者、协调者或执行者。他们掌握了团队完成物质或意识形态目标所需的一些信息:角色之间的沟通是成功的必要条件。我们还操纵了与计划活动的沟通相关的风险级别。对于一半的参与者来说,就计划进行沟通的风险是中等的。对另一半来说,这种交流的风险很高。这个过程允许我们检查网络成员愿意与谁沟通,给出了追求的目标和相关的风险水平。结果:虽然目标类型、风险水平和目标类型×风险交互作用不能显著预测沟通决策,但内容分析表明,参与者在追求目标的同时试图导航风险。参与者采用不同的沟通策略:个体差异解释了网络成员如何沟通的最大差异。我们希望本研究引入的网络应用和范式将有助于进一步检查非法网络的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信