Analysing inefficiency in a non-parametric spatial-dynamic by-production framework: A k-nearest neighbour proposal

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Ioannis Skevas, Alfons Oude Lansink, Theodoros Skevas
{"title":"Analysing inefficiency in a non-parametric spatial-dynamic by-production framework: A k-nearest neighbour proposal","authors":"Ioannis Skevas,&nbsp;Alfons Oude Lansink,&nbsp;Theodoros Skevas","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper accounts for spatial effects by benchmarking farms against their <i>k</i>-nearest neighbours (KNN) and measuring their inefficiency in a non-parametric dynamic by-production setting. The optimal number of neighbours <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ k $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> against which farms are compared corresponds to the value of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ k $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> that maximises the Moran I test for spatial autocorrelation of the good and the bad output of the farms' two sub-technologies. The inefficiency scores for farms' good output, variable inputs, investments and bad outputs are then computed and compared with those calculated based on a global technology, which benchmarks all farms together. The application focuses on an unbalanced panel of specialised Dutch dairy farms over the period 2009–2016 that contains information on their exact geographical locations. The results suggest that the inefficiency scores exhibit statistically significant differences between the KNN and the global model. Specifically, the inefficiencies are generally deflated when a KNN technology is considered, suggesting that ignoring spatial effects can overestimate inefficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 2","pages":"591-607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12522","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper accounts for spatial effects by benchmarking farms against their k-nearest neighbours (KNN) and measuring their inefficiency in a non-parametric dynamic by-production setting. The optimal number of neighbours k $$ k $$ against which farms are compared corresponds to the value of k $$ k $$ that maximises the Moran I test for spatial autocorrelation of the good and the bad output of the farms' two sub-technologies. The inefficiency scores for farms' good output, variable inputs, investments and bad outputs are then computed and compared with those calculated based on a global technology, which benchmarks all farms together. The application focuses on an unbalanced panel of specialised Dutch dairy farms over the period 2009–2016 that contains information on their exact geographical locations. The results suggest that the inefficiency scores exhibit statistically significant differences between the KNN and the global model. Specifically, the inefficiencies are generally deflated when a KNN technology is considered, suggesting that ignoring spatial effects can overestimate inefficiency.

Abstract Image

分析非参数空间动态生产框架中的效率低下:一个k近邻建议
本文通过对农场的k近邻(KNN)进行基准测试,并在非参数动态副生产设置中测量它们的低效率,来解释空间效应。与农场进行比较的邻居k $$ k $$的最佳数量对应于k $$ k $$的值,该值最大化了农场两个子技术的好和坏产出的Moran I测试的空间自相关性。然后计算农场的良好产出、可变投入、投资和不良产出的低效率得分,并与基于全球技术的计算结果进行比较,该技术将所有农场放在一起作为基准。该应用程序侧重于2009年至2016年期间荷兰专业奶牛场的不平衡面板,其中包含有关其确切地理位置的信息。结果表明,低效率得分在KNN和全局模型之间表现出统计学上的显著差异。具体来说,当考虑到KNN技术时,低效率通常会降低,这表明忽略空间效应可能会高估低效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment. Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信