Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction

A. Lakel
{"title":"Microstructural Studies of Materials DD1 and KT2 By X-Ray Diffraction","authors":"A. Lakel","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.2606600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we have studied two Kaolin .kaolin DD1 which consists of two main phases (kaolinite and Halloysite) and Tamazert kaolin .kaolin KT2 whose main constituents are kaolinite, quartz and mica. Our choice was set on the component that is Kaolinite because of the existence of the latter in both kaolins. A correction of Lorentz-Polarization was carried out prior to the diffraction data, which has been achieved using LWL program dome. The true profile was extracted by this program. The methods used for the micro structural analysis of the present in the two Kaolins are the Warren - Averbach and the Williamson – Hall methods Scherrer's relationship has been applied in cases where the compound is devoid of strains. \nThe study revealed that the kaolin Kaolinite DD1 is devoid of micro constraints. Which similar analysis has shown that the Kaolinite in KT2 incorporates the strains. This was confirmed by the Williamson - Hall method as well as Fourier analysis. The evaluation of strains in the Kaolinite of KT2 has been dome the method of Warren - Averbach and Williamson – Hall diagram. The average value of this constraint found by the first method us 0.15 and 0.21 by the second method gave. The average size of crystallites of the Kaolinite in DD1 was found between 29 A and 230 A. \nby the method of Warren - Averbach and about 118 A  by the method of Williamson - Hall. Range the second Kaolinite the Kaolinite KT2, the size obtained was respectively 98 A and 130 A using to by methods. The study of the size distribution showed that the dominant size of Kaolinite in DD1 and KT2 is about 40 A (42%) and 58 A (32%). respectively.","PeriodicalId":33130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Building Materials and Structures","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Building Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2606600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this work, we have studied two Kaolin .kaolin DD1 which consists of two main phases (kaolinite and Halloysite) and Tamazert kaolin .kaolin KT2 whose main constituents are kaolinite, quartz and mica. Our choice was set on the component that is Kaolinite because of the existence of the latter in both kaolins. A correction of Lorentz-Polarization was carried out prior to the diffraction data, which has been achieved using LWL program dome. The true profile was extracted by this program. The methods used for the micro structural analysis of the present in the two Kaolins are the Warren - Averbach and the Williamson – Hall methods Scherrer's relationship has been applied in cases where the compound is devoid of strains. The study revealed that the kaolin Kaolinite DD1 is devoid of micro constraints. Which similar analysis has shown that the Kaolinite in KT2 incorporates the strains. This was confirmed by the Williamson - Hall method as well as Fourier analysis. The evaluation of strains in the Kaolinite of KT2 has been dome the method of Warren - Averbach and Williamson – Hall diagram. The average value of this constraint found by the first method us 0.15 and 0.21 by the second method gave. The average size of crystallites of the Kaolinite in DD1 was found between 29 A and 230 A. by the method of Warren - Averbach and about 118 A  by the method of Williamson - Hall. Range the second Kaolinite the Kaolinite KT2, the size obtained was respectively 98 A and 130 A using to by methods. The study of the size distribution showed that the dominant size of Kaolinite in DD1 and KT2 is about 40 A (42%) and 58 A (32%). respectively.
DD1和KT2材料的X射线衍射微观结构研究
本文研究了两种高岭土。高岭土DD1,它由两个主要相(高岭石和哈洛石)组成,Tamazert高岭土。高岭土KT2,它的主要成分是高岭石、石英和云母。我们选择的成分是高岭土,因为高岭土在两种高岭土中都存在。洛伦兹偏振的校正是在衍射数据之前进行的,这是使用LWL程序圆顶实现的。该程序提取了真实的配置文件。两种高岭土中用于微观结构分析的方法是Warren-Averbach和Williamson-Hall方法。Scherrer关系式已应用于化合物没有菌株的情况。研究表明,高岭土高岭土DD1无微观约束。类似的分析表明KT2中的高岭土含有菌株。Williamson-Hall方法和傅立叶分析都证实了这一点。采用Warren-Averbach和Williamson-Hall图方法对KT2高岭土中的应变进行了评价。第一种方法得到的该约束的平均值为0.15,第二种方法得到了0.21。DD1中高岭土的平均晶粒尺寸通过Warren-Averbach的方法在29A和230A之间,通过Williamson-Hall的方法在约118A之间。在第二种高岭土-高岭土KT2的范围内,用to by方法得到的尺寸分别为98A和130A。粒度分布研究表明,高岭土在DD1和KT2中的主要粒度分别为40A(42%)和58A(32%)。分别地
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书