Mahmoud Darwish and Tanure Ojaide

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ghada A. Mohammad, W. Abdulaali
{"title":"Mahmoud Darwish and Tanure Ojaide","authors":"Ghada A. Mohammad, W. Abdulaali","doi":"10.4312/ars.14.1.41-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Darwish, the spokesman of Palestine, and Ojaide, the voice of Nigeria, are endowed with a faculty for articulating a message, a vision or an opinion for their nations. They are intellectuals essentially tied to the needs of their communities. Both poets belong to countries that witnessed different types of political, economic, and social turmoil. They inspire the oppressed nations to persist in their struggles against the regimes which deprive them of their right to live happily and peacefully. Darwish experienced many displacements that turned him into an embodiment of exile, in both existential and metaphysical terms, beyond the external, and the metaphorical, in his interior relations with self and poetry. His poetry of exile mirrors the socio-political atmosphere under the Israeli occupation. He utilizes poetry as a weapon in his fight to achieve freedom and independence. Similarly, Ojaide’s poetry is engaged with the crises of his homeland, the Niger Delta. He belongs to the generation of Nigerian writers who used their literary productions as a weapon against social injustice and an instrument in resisting imperialism. To him, there is a direct relationship between literature and social institutions. The principal function of literature is to criticize these institutions and eventually bring about desirable changes in society. This study aims at examining Darwish and Ojaide as poets of exile by observing their exilic experiences and investigating certain poems that typically help dive into their external and internal sense of displacement. The study also highlights the concepts of home and homelessness. It brings to light the poets’ deep yearning for a sense of belonging and their insistence on regaining the motherland toward which they show a profound attachment and permanent commitment. They use words as a therapeutic means to compensate for the lack of a physical homeland. A comparison between the two poets is also provided.","PeriodicalId":40773,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"14 1","pages":"41-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars & Humanitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.14.1.41-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Darwish, the spokesman of Palestine, and Ojaide, the voice of Nigeria, are endowed with a faculty for articulating a message, a vision or an opinion for their nations. They are intellectuals essentially tied to the needs of their communities. Both poets belong to countries that witnessed different types of political, economic, and social turmoil. They inspire the oppressed nations to persist in their struggles against the regimes which deprive them of their right to live happily and peacefully. Darwish experienced many displacements that turned him into an embodiment of exile, in both existential and metaphysical terms, beyond the external, and the metaphorical, in his interior relations with self and poetry. His poetry of exile mirrors the socio-political atmosphere under the Israeli occupation. He utilizes poetry as a weapon in his fight to achieve freedom and independence. Similarly, Ojaide’s poetry is engaged with the crises of his homeland, the Niger Delta. He belongs to the generation of Nigerian writers who used their literary productions as a weapon against social injustice and an instrument in resisting imperialism. To him, there is a direct relationship between literature and social institutions. The principal function of literature is to criticize these institutions and eventually bring about desirable changes in society. This study aims at examining Darwish and Ojaide as poets of exile by observing their exilic experiences and investigating certain poems that typically help dive into their external and internal sense of displacement. The study also highlights the concepts of home and homelessness. It brings to light the poets’ deep yearning for a sense of belonging and their insistence on regaining the motherland toward which they show a profound attachment and permanent commitment. They use words as a therapeutic means to compensate for the lack of a physical homeland. A comparison between the two poets is also provided.
Mahmoud Darwish和Tanure Ojaide
巴勒斯坦发言人达尔维什(Darwish)和尼日利亚之声奥贾德(Ojaide)天生就具有为各自国家表达信息、愿景或观点的能力。他们是知识分子,本质上与社区的需求联系在一起。两位诗人所在的国家经历了不同类型的政治、经济和社会动荡。他们鼓舞被压迫民族坚持斗争,反对剥夺他们幸福与和平生活权利的政权。达尔维什经历了许多流离失所的经历,使他成为一个流亡的化身,在存在主义和形而上学的术语中,超越了外在和隐喻,在他与自我和诗歌的内在关系中。他的流亡诗歌反映了以色列占领下的社会政治氛围。他利用诗歌作为他争取自由和独立的武器。同样,Ojaide的诗歌与他的家乡尼日尔三角洲的危机有关。他属于把自己的文学作品作为反对社会不公的武器和抵抗帝国主义的工具的那一代尼日利亚作家。在他看来,文学与社会制度之间有着直接的关系。文学的主要功能是批评这些制度,并最终给社会带来令人满意的变化。本研究旨在通过观察达尔维什和奥加德的流亡经历,并研究一些典型的有助于深入了解他们外部和内部流离失所感的诗歌,来审视他们作为流亡诗人的身份。该研究还强调了家和无家可归的概念。它揭示了诗人对归属感的深切向往和对重归故土的执着,揭示了诗人对故土的深切依恋和永恒承诺。他们用文字作为一种治疗手段来弥补物质家园的缺失。本文还对两位诗人进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ars & Humanitas
Ars & Humanitas HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信