Localizing Jihad, Globalizing Jimat: Banser and Jamaah Maiyah in a Global Village

A. Karim
{"title":"Localizing Jihad, Globalizing Jimat: Banser and Jamaah Maiyah in a Global Village","authors":"A. Karim","doi":"10.21580/WS.27.1.4519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last two decades, a dramatic transition from authoritarianism to a rapid process of democratization has been experienced by many different societies across the world. In Indonesia, reformasi 1998 has not only been followed by a massive transformation in many different dimensions but also the changing character of interdependently hybrid governance arrangements which lead to an ‘authoritarian turn’, particularly concerning about the visions of social harmony within a post-democratization context that is impacted by religious violent extremism. As such extremism is experienced daily in Indonesia and elsewhere in the world, while there is an absence of effective state interventions or at least the fact that state is no longer perceived as the principle referent for security, there has been an exceptional trend of what I call ‘ref-ormas-i'. It indicates how non-state actors, more specifically Ormas (mass organizations) is taking the shape of providing people’s basic needs, professing security, promoting inter-religious tolerance, and even campaigning nationalism in the local, national, and global communities. This phenomenon certainly raises a question of how the non-state actors organize their role ‘acting like a state’ in society to produce new forms of ‘imagined communities’. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in two different Indonesian urban settings in Surabaya and Yogyakarta, this paper focuses on elaborating the roles of two different moderate Islamic groups, Banser and Jamaah Maiyah, more specifically on the discourses they use and the empirical actions they perform in securing the local community, defending the national ideology, and idealizing the global harmony through different interpretation of jihad and different approach of engagement in the society, more specifically for responding wide-spread religious extremism.","PeriodicalId":31097,"journal":{"name":"Walisongo Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Walisongo Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/WS.27.1.4519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last two decades, a dramatic transition from authoritarianism to a rapid process of democratization has been experienced by many different societies across the world. In Indonesia, reformasi 1998 has not only been followed by a massive transformation in many different dimensions but also the changing character of interdependently hybrid governance arrangements which lead to an ‘authoritarian turn’, particularly concerning about the visions of social harmony within a post-democratization context that is impacted by religious violent extremism. As such extremism is experienced daily in Indonesia and elsewhere in the world, while there is an absence of effective state interventions or at least the fact that state is no longer perceived as the principle referent for security, there has been an exceptional trend of what I call ‘ref-ormas-i'. It indicates how non-state actors, more specifically Ormas (mass organizations) is taking the shape of providing people’s basic needs, professing security, promoting inter-religious tolerance, and even campaigning nationalism in the local, national, and global communities. This phenomenon certainly raises a question of how the non-state actors organize their role ‘acting like a state’ in society to produce new forms of ‘imagined communities’. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in two different Indonesian urban settings in Surabaya and Yogyakarta, this paper focuses on elaborating the roles of two different moderate Islamic groups, Banser and Jamaah Maiyah, more specifically on the discourses they use and the empirical actions they perform in securing the local community, defending the national ideology, and idealizing the global harmony through different interpretation of jihad and different approach of engagement in the society, more specifically for responding wide-spread religious extremism.
本土化圣战,全球化圣战:Banser和Jamaah Maiyah在一个地球村
在过去的二十年里,世界上许多不同的社会经历了从专制主义到快速民主化进程的戏剧性转变。在印度尼西亚,1998年改革之后,不仅在许多不同方面发生了巨大的转变,而且相互依存的混合治理安排的性质也发生了变化,导致“专制转向”,特别是在受宗教暴力极端主义影响的后民主化背景下,社会和谐的愿景。由于这种极端主义在印度尼西亚和世界其他地方每天都在经历,而缺乏有效的国家干预,或者至少国家不再被视为安全的主要参考,因此出现了一种我称之为“改革-改革”的特殊趋势。它表明了非国家行为体,更具体地说是群众组织(Ormas)是如何提供人们的基本需求、宣称安全、促进宗教间宽容,甚至在地方、国家和全球社区中宣传民族主义的。这一现象无疑提出了一个问题,即非国家行为体如何在社会中“像国家一样”组织其角色,以产生新形式的“想象社区”。基于在泗水和日arta两个不同的印度尼西亚城市环境中的民族志田野调查,本文重点阐述了两个不同的温和伊斯兰团体Banser和Jamaah Maiyah的角色,更具体地说,通过对圣战的不同解释和不同的社会参与方式,他们使用的话语和他们在保护当地社区,捍卫国家意识形态和理想化全球和谐方面所采取的经验主义行动。更具体地说,是为了应对广泛传播的宗教极端主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书