How transparent are quantitative studies in contemporary technology education research? Instrument development and analysis

IF 2 3区工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

International Journal of Technology and Design Education Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s10798-023-09827-9

J. Buckley, Jeová Araújo, Ifeoluwapo Aribilola, Iram Arshad, M. Azeem, Ciara Buckley, Alison Fagan, Daniel P. Fitzpatrick, Diana A. Garza Herrera, Tomás Hyland, Muhammad Babar Imtiaz, Muhammad Bilal Khan, Eduardo Lanzagorta Garcia, Bhagyabati Moharana, Mohd Sufino Zuhaily Mohd Sufian, K. Osterwald, Joseph Phelan, Anastasia Platonava, Clodagh Reid, Michèle Renard, Laura G Rodriguez Barroso, Jeremiah Scully, Gilberto Silva Nunes Bezerra, Tomasz Szank, Mehwish Tahir, Mairéad Teehan, Sowmya Vijayakumar, Ismin Zainol

引用次数: 0

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

当代技术教育研究中的定量研究有多透明?仪器开发与分析

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 工程技术-工程：综合

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

19.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Technology and Design Education seeks to encourage research and scholarly writing about any aspect of technology and design education. Critical, review, and comparative studies are particularly prominent, as are contributions which draw upon other literatures, such as those derived from historical, philosophical, sociological or psychological studies of technology or design, in order to address issues of concern to technology and design education. One of the most significant developments of recent years has been the emergence of technology and design education as an integral part of general education in many parts of the world. Its distinctive curriculum features are technological literacy and capability and it highlights the importance of `knowledge in action'', of `doing'' as well as `understanding''.