Different training responses in elderly men and women following a prolonged muscle resistance training intervention

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Anne Theil Gates, K. Mertz, Mads Bloch-Ibenfeldt, E. Garde, Maria Baekgaard, R. Svensson, M. Kjaer
{"title":"Different training responses in elderly men and women following a prolonged muscle resistance training intervention","authors":"Anne Theil Gates, K. Mertz, Mads Bloch-Ibenfeldt, E. Garde, Maria Baekgaard, R. Svensson, M. Kjaer","doi":"10.1002/tsm2.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resistance training is an effective strategy to counteract the age‐related loss of muscle mass and strength in elderly, but whether the benefits of training differ between sexes is unclear. A total of 297 elderly men and women were randomized to 1 year of heavy resistance training (HRT) or control (CON). Changes in muscle function and body composition were compared between sexes and groups. Improvements in muscle strength, body fat, muscle mass and size were observed, but the absolute improvements in muscle strength (23 Nm ± 2.3 vs 11 Nm ± 2.2, P < .01) and visceral fat content (−215 g ± 50 vs −60 g ± 21, P < .01) were greater in men. Also, the relative decrease in body fat % (−6.8% ± 1.1 vs −2.7% ± 0.7, P < .05) and fat mass (−7.9% ± 1.4 vs −2.7% ± 1.0, P < .05) was more pronounced in men. Heavy resistance training improved more than CON in most muscular and body composition parameters with greater increase in muscle strength and decrease in body fat in men. Consequently, resistance training is recommendable to counteract age‐related losses of muscle mass and strength and to reduce body fat in elderly, however, with a small advantage for men in parameters that predict metabolic risk factors.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Resistance training is an effective strategy to counteract the age‐related loss of muscle mass and strength in elderly, but whether the benefits of training differ between sexes is unclear. A total of 297 elderly men and women were randomized to 1 year of heavy resistance training (HRT) or control (CON). Changes in muscle function and body composition were compared between sexes and groups. Improvements in muscle strength, body fat, muscle mass and size were observed, but the absolute improvements in muscle strength (23 Nm ± 2.3 vs 11 Nm ± 2.2, P < .01) and visceral fat content (−215 g ± 50 vs −60 g ± 21, P < .01) were greater in men. Also, the relative decrease in body fat % (−6.8% ± 1.1 vs −2.7% ± 0.7, P < .05) and fat mass (−7.9% ± 1.4 vs −2.7% ± 1.0, P < .05) was more pronounced in men. Heavy resistance training improved more than CON in most muscular and body composition parameters with greater increase in muscle strength and decrease in body fat in men. Consequently, resistance training is recommendable to counteract age‐related losses of muscle mass and strength and to reduce body fat in elderly, however, with a small advantage for men in parameters that predict metabolic risk factors.
老年男性和女性在长期肌肉阻力训练干预后的不同训练反应
阻力训练是一种有效的策略,可以抵消老年人与年龄相关的肌肉质量和力量损失,但训练的益处是否因性别而异尚不清楚。共有297名老年男性和女性被随机分配到为期1年的高阻力训练(HRT)或对照组(CON)。比较不同性别和组间肌肉功能和身体成分的变化。观察到肌肉力量、体脂、肌肉质量和大小的改善,但男性肌肉力量(23 Nm±2.3 vs 11 Nm±2.2,P<0.01)和内脏脂肪含量(−215 g±50 vs−60 g±21,P<0.01)的绝对改善更大。此外,男性的体脂%(−6.8%±1.1 vs−2.7%±0.7,P<0.05)和脂肪量(−7.9%±1.4 vs−2.7%±1.0,P<.05)的相对下降更为明显。大阻力训练在大多数肌肉和身体成分参数上都比CON改善得更多,男性的肌肉力量增加得更多,体脂减少得更多。因此,建议进行阻力训练,以抵消与年龄相关的肌肉质量和力量损失,并减少老年人的体脂,然而,在预测代谢风险因素的参数方面,男性的优势很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信