Digestibility of Ensiled Maize Hybrids Differing by Maturity and Endosperm Type

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
R. Loučka, P. Homolka, Y. Tyrolová, F. Jančík, V. Koukolová, P. Kubelková, A. Výborná, V. Jambor
{"title":"Digestibility of Ensiled Maize Hybrids Differing by Maturity and Endosperm Type","authors":"R. Loučka, P. Homolka, Y. Tyrolová, F. Jančík, V. Koukolová, P. Kubelková, A. Výborná, V. Jambor","doi":"10.2478/sab-2018-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Selected maize hybrids were analyzed according to the in vivo digestibility of the silage. Eight tested hybrids were grown, harvested, and ensiled under identical conditions. The effect of earliness (early maturity group FAO 230–260 vs moderately early maturity group FAO 290–340) significantly (P < 0.05) affected the chemical composition, fermentation quality, and digestibility of neutral and acid detergent fibre. Type of kernel endosperm (dent vs flint) differed by digestibility of nutrients. Digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and neutral detergent fibre was the highest for silage of the dent hybrid FAO 250 (73.7, 75.7, and 67.6%, respectively) and these digestibility values were significantly (P < 0.05) lower for silage of the dent hybrid FAO 320 (61.1, 63.4, and 51.4%, respectively). It was concluded that the digestibility differs mainly in dent-type hybrids. All correlation coefficients between the digestibility values were significantly (P < 0.05) high.","PeriodicalId":53537,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sab-2018-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Selected maize hybrids were analyzed according to the in vivo digestibility of the silage. Eight tested hybrids were grown, harvested, and ensiled under identical conditions. The effect of earliness (early maturity group FAO 230–260 vs moderately early maturity group FAO 290–340) significantly (P < 0.05) affected the chemical composition, fermentation quality, and digestibility of neutral and acid detergent fibre. Type of kernel endosperm (dent vs flint) differed by digestibility of nutrients. Digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and neutral detergent fibre was the highest for silage of the dent hybrid FAO 250 (73.7, 75.7, and 67.6%, respectively) and these digestibility values were significantly (P < 0.05) lower for silage of the dent hybrid FAO 320 (61.1, 63.4, and 51.4%, respectively). It was concluded that the digestibility differs mainly in dent-type hybrids. All correlation coefficients between the digestibility values were significantly (P < 0.05) high.
不同成熟度和胚乳类型玉米自交系的消化率
摘要根据青贮饲料的体内消化率对所选玉米杂交种进行了分析。八个测试的杂交种在相同的条件下生长、收获和青贮。早熟效应(早熟组FAO 230–260与中度早熟组FAO290–340)显著影响中性和酸性洗涤剂纤维的化学成分、发酵质量以及消化率(P<0.05)。籽粒胚乳的类型(凹痕和燧石)因营养物质的消化率不同而不同。干物质、有机物和中性洗涤剂纤维的消化率在凹痕杂交种FAO 250的青贮饲料中最高(分别为73.7%、75.7%和67.6%),而这些消化率值在凹痕杂交品种FAO 320的青贮饲料(分别为61.1%、63.4%和51.4%)中显著降低(P<0.05)。结果表明,凹痕型杂交种的消化率差异较大。各消化率之间的相关系数均显著较高(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信