Assuring the quality of online learning in higher education: Adaptations in design and implementation

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Athina Konstantinidou, Efi A. Nisiforou
{"title":"Assuring the quality of online learning in higher education: Adaptations in design and implementation","authors":"Athina Konstantinidou, Efi A. Nisiforou","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In higher education, designing online courses aligned with students’ preferences impacts learning effectiveness. Our research aimed to investigate which learning design elements can affect the quality of online learning. To achieve this, we followed a systematic literature review, identified current trends and conducted an online survey outlining university students’ opinions. The results revealed that students’ preferences agree with universal learning design principles, acting as course quality determinants. These elements relate to the structure, appearance, content, interactivity of the course and support in the online setting. We recommend that courses are well organised and include authentic resources, activities and assessments, divided consistently into smaller, topic-based chunks that resemble experiences drawn from real life. The objectives need to be communicated while the expected behaviours are known to students. The respective workload must be equally distributed across the course spectrum in an environment that balances collaborative and self-paced learning. Students must be familiar with the technology, which is also an easy-to-access gate. Lastly, it is suggested that technical and pedagogical support is constantly present so that participants efficiently work in the online context.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nIn collaboration with educators, instructional designers can use the quality indicators that emerged through the study when designing and evaluating higher education courses.\nInstructional designers and educators may prioritise learners' autonomy, aligning course requirements with students' sense of control.\nInstructional designers and educators can distribute students’ workload equally throughout the course, without strict deadlines, to improve the learning experience.\nEducators may promote collaborative assignments but moderately balance them with an individual-based assessment mode.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In higher education, designing online courses aligned with students’ preferences impacts learning effectiveness. Our research aimed to investigate which learning design elements can affect the quality of online learning. To achieve this, we followed a systematic literature review, identified current trends and conducted an online survey outlining university students’ opinions. The results revealed that students’ preferences agree with universal learning design principles, acting as course quality determinants. These elements relate to the structure, appearance, content, interactivity of the course and support in the online setting. We recommend that courses are well organised and include authentic resources, activities and assessments, divided consistently into smaller, topic-based chunks that resemble experiences drawn from real life. The objectives need to be communicated while the expected behaviours are known to students. The respective workload must be equally distributed across the course spectrum in an environment that balances collaborative and self-paced learning. Students must be familiar with the technology, which is also an easy-to-access gate. Lastly, it is suggested that technical and pedagogical support is constantly present so that participants efficiently work in the online context. Implications for practice or policy: In collaboration with educators, instructional designers can use the quality indicators that emerged through the study when designing and evaluating higher education courses. Instructional designers and educators may prioritise learners' autonomy, aligning course requirements with students' sense of control. Instructional designers and educators can distribute students’ workload equally throughout the course, without strict deadlines, to improve the learning experience. Educators may promote collaborative assignments but moderately balance them with an individual-based assessment mode.
保证高等教育在线学习的质量:设计和实施的适应
在高等教育中,设计符合学生喜好的在线课程会影响学习效果。我们的研究旨在调查哪些学习设计元素会影响在线学习的质量。为了实现这一目标,我们进行了系统的文献综述,确定了当前的趋势,并进行了一项概述大学生观点的在线调查。结果表明,学生的偏好与通用的学习设计原则一致,是课程质量的决定因素。这些要素涉及到课程的结构、外观、内容、互动性以及在线设置中的支持。我们建议课程组织良好,包括真实的资源,活动和评估,始终分为更小的,基于主题的块,类似于从现实生活中汲取的经验。当学生知道预期的行为时,目标需要被传达。在平衡协作学习和自主学习的环境中,各自的工作量必须在整个课程范围内平均分配。学生们必须熟悉这项技术,这也是一个容易进入的大门。最后,建议不断提供技术和教学支持,以便参与者在在线环境中有效地工作。对实践或政策的启示:与教育工作者合作,教学设计师可以在设计和评估高等教育课程时使用通过研究得出的质量指标。教学设计师和教育工作者可能会优先考虑学习者的自主权,使课程要求与学生的控制感保持一致。教学设计师和教育工作者可以在整个课程中平均分配学生的工作量,没有严格的截止日期,以改善学习体验。教育工作者可能会提倡合作作业,但适度平衡他们与个人为基础的评估模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信