Less in-toeing after femoral derotation osteotomy in adult patients with increased femoral version and posterior hip impingement compared to patients with femoral retroversion

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
T. Lerch, A. Boschung, C. Leibold, R. Kalla, H. Kerkeni, H. Baur, P. Eichelberger, K. Siebenrock, M. Tannast, S. Steppacher, Emanuel F. Liechti
{"title":"Less in-toeing after femoral derotation osteotomy in adult patients with increased femoral version and posterior hip impingement compared to patients with femoral retroversion","authors":"T. Lerch, A. Boschung, C. Leibold, R. Kalla, H. Kerkeni, H. Baur, P. Eichelberger, K. Siebenrock, M. Tannast, S. Steppacher, Emanuel F. Liechti","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnac001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In-toeing of the foot was associated with high femoral version (FV), while Out-toeing was associated with femoral-retroversion. Therefore, we report on (i) foot-progression-angle (FPA), (ii) prevalence of In-toeing and Out-toeing, and (iii) clinical outcome of patients treated with femoral-derotation-osteotomy (FDO). We performed a retrospective analysis involving 20 patients (20 hips) treated with unilateral FDO (2017–18). Of them, 14 patients had increased FV, 6 patients had femoral-retroversion. Follow-up time was mean 1 ± 1 years. All patients had minimal 1-year follow-up and the mean age was 29 ± 8 years. Patients with increased FV (FV > 35°) presented with positive posterior-impingement-test and mean FV was 49 ± 11° (Murphy method). Six patients with femoral-retroversion (FV < 10°) had positive anterior impingement test and mean FV of 5 ± 4°. Instrumented gait analysis was performed preoperatively and at follow-up using the Gaitrite system to measure FPA and was compared to a control group of 18 healthy asymptomatic volunteers (36 feet, mean age 29 ± 6 years). (i) Mean FPA increased significantly (P = 0.006) from preoperative 1.3 ± 7° to 4.5 ± 6° at follow-up for patients with increased FV and was not significantly different compared to the control group (4.0 ± 4.5°). (ii) In-toeing decreased from preoperatively (five patients) to follow-up (two patients) for patients with increased FV. Out-toeing decreased from preoperatively (two patients) to follow-up (no patient) for patients with femoral-retroversion. (iii) Subjective-hip-value of all patients increased significantly (P < 0.001) from preoperative 21 to 78 points at follow-up. WOMAC was 12 ± 8 points at follow-up. Patients with increased FV that underwent FDO walked with less In-toeing. FDO has the potential to reduce In-toeing and Out-toeing and to improve subjective satisfaction at follow-up.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"35 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In-toeing of the foot was associated with high femoral version (FV), while Out-toeing was associated with femoral-retroversion. Therefore, we report on (i) foot-progression-angle (FPA), (ii) prevalence of In-toeing and Out-toeing, and (iii) clinical outcome of patients treated with femoral-derotation-osteotomy (FDO). We performed a retrospective analysis involving 20 patients (20 hips) treated with unilateral FDO (2017–18). Of them, 14 patients had increased FV, 6 patients had femoral-retroversion. Follow-up time was mean 1 ± 1 years. All patients had minimal 1-year follow-up and the mean age was 29 ± 8 years. Patients with increased FV (FV > 35°) presented with positive posterior-impingement-test and mean FV was 49 ± 11° (Murphy method). Six patients with femoral-retroversion (FV < 10°) had positive anterior impingement test and mean FV of 5 ± 4°. Instrumented gait analysis was performed preoperatively and at follow-up using the Gaitrite system to measure FPA and was compared to a control group of 18 healthy asymptomatic volunteers (36 feet, mean age 29 ± 6 years). (i) Mean FPA increased significantly (P = 0.006) from preoperative 1.3 ± 7° to 4.5 ± 6° at follow-up for patients with increased FV and was not significantly different compared to the control group (4.0 ± 4.5°). (ii) In-toeing decreased from preoperatively (five patients) to follow-up (two patients) for patients with increased FV. Out-toeing decreased from preoperatively (two patients) to follow-up (no patient) for patients with femoral-retroversion. (iii) Subjective-hip-value of all patients increased significantly (P < 0.001) from preoperative 21 to 78 points at follow-up. WOMAC was 12 ± 8 points at follow-up. Patients with increased FV that underwent FDO walked with less In-toeing. FDO has the potential to reduce In-toeing and Out-toeing and to improve subjective satisfaction at follow-up.
与股骨后倾患者相比,股骨后倾和髋关节后撞击增加的成年患者股骨去旋截骨后足趾减少
摘要足趾内侧与股骨高位内翻(FV)相关,而足趾外侧与股骨后倾相关。因此,我们报告了(i)足部进展角(FPA),(ii)内趾和外趾的患病率,以及(iii)接受股骨旋转截骨(FDO)治疗的患者的临床结果。我们对20名接受单侧FDO治疗的患者(20髋)进行了回顾性分析(2017-18)。其中14例患者FV升高,6例患者发生股骨后倾。随访时间平均为1 ± 1. 年。所有患者都进行了最少的1年随访,平均年龄为29岁 ± 8. 年。FV增加的患者(FV > 35°)后撞击试验呈阳性,平均FV为49 ± 11°(Murphy法)。6名股骨后倾角(FV)患者 < 10°)的前撞击试验呈阳性,平均FV为5 ± 4°。术前和随访时使用Gaitrite系统进行仪器步态分析,以测量FPA,并与18名健康无症状志愿者(36英尺,平均年龄29岁)的对照组进行比较 ± 6. 年)。(i) 平均FPA显著增加(P = 0.006)从术前1.3 ± 7°至4.5 ± 随访时FV增加的患者为6°,与对照组相比没有显著差异(4.0 ± 4.5°)。(ii)对于FV增加的患者,从术前(5名患者)到随访(2名患者),趾内活动减少。从术前(两名患者)到随访(无患者),股骨后倾患者的趾外活动减少。(iii)所有患者的主观髋关节价值均显著增加(P < 0.001)。WOMAC当时12岁 ± 随访得8分。接受FDO的FV增加的患者走路时足趾较少。FDO有可能减少内向和外向,并提高随访时的主观满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信