Teachers' Views of Their Practices Related to Common Core State Standards-Aligned Assessments

Q3 Social Sciences
Heather M. Buzick, Anna Rhoad-Drogalis, Cara C. Laitusis, Teresa C. King
{"title":"Teachers' Views of Their Practices Related to Common Core State Standards-Aligned Assessments","authors":"Heather M. Buzick,&nbsp;Anna Rhoad-Drogalis,&nbsp;Cara C. Laitusis,&nbsp;Teresa C. King","doi":"10.1002/ets2.12277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A fundamental claim for Common Core State Standards (CCSS)-aligned assessments is that they will lead to better teaching practices. The purpose of this study is to seek evidence in support of this claim by surveying teachers about their instructional practices, test preparation strategies, and test score use both before and after the introduction of CCSS-aligned assessments. Baseline and trend data were collected via five Web-based surveys, administered over 2 years to elementary and middle school English language arts and mathematics teachers in one state, New Jersey. Responses to the first three surveys (<i>n</i><sub>1</sub> = 402 teachers, <i>n</i><sub>2</sub> = 469 teachers, and <i>n</i><sub>3</sub> = 175 teachers from 4% to 6% of New Jersey schools) are summarized and described; results from the remaining surveys are omitted due to low response. Challenges to collecting empirical evidence in support of the validity argument and theory of action for a new assessment are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11972,"journal":{"name":"ETS Research Report Series","volume":"2019 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ets2.12277","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETS Research Report Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A fundamental claim for Common Core State Standards (CCSS)-aligned assessments is that they will lead to better teaching practices. The purpose of this study is to seek evidence in support of this claim by surveying teachers about their instructional practices, test preparation strategies, and test score use both before and after the introduction of CCSS-aligned assessments. Baseline and trend data were collected via five Web-based surveys, administered over 2 years to elementary and middle school English language arts and mathematics teachers in one state, New Jersey. Responses to the first three surveys (n1 = 402 teachers, n2 = 469 teachers, and n3 = 175 teachers from 4% to 6% of New Jersey schools) are summarized and described; results from the remaining surveys are omitted due to low response. Challenges to collecting empirical evidence in support of the validity argument and theory of action for a new assessment are discussed.

Abstract Image

教师对与共同核心州标准一致的评估相关的实践的看法
与共同核心州标准(CCSS)相一致的评估的一个基本主张是,它们将导致更好的教学实践。本研究的目的是通过调查教师的教学实践、考试准备策略和考试分数的使用,在引入ccss一致的评估之前和之后,寻求支持这一说法的证据。基线和趋势数据是通过五项基于网络的调查收集的,这些调查在两年多的时间里对新泽西州的中小学英语语言艺术和数学教师进行了调查。对前三次调查(n1 = 402名教师,n2 = 469名教师,n3 = 175名教师,来自新泽西州4%至6%的学校)的回应进行了总结和描述;其余调查的结果因反应较低而略去。挑战收集经验证据,以支持有效性论点和行动理论的新评估进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ETS Research Report Series
ETS Research Report Series Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信