The Differential Relationship Between Self-Reported Interoceptive Accuracy and Attention With Psychopathology

IF 0.6 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.1026/1616-3443/a000678

Sebastian Brand, Tara M Petzke, M. Witthöft

{"title":"The Differential Relationship Between Self-Reported Interoceptive Accuracy and Attention With Psychopathology","authors":"Sebastian Brand, Tara M Petzke, M. Witthöft","doi":"10.1026/1616-3443/a000678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Background: Only recently has interoception been discussed as a common risk factor for psychopathology. Recent approaches distinguish between the ability to accurately perceive ( interoceptive accuracy) and the propensity to attend ( interoceptive attention) to internal signals. Objective: To examine the latent structure of self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention and their relationships to psychopathology. Methods: We used a confirmatory factor analysis to clarify the latent structure of interoceptive accuracy and attention. Structural equation modeling was utilized to determine relationships between both abilities with internalizing and somatoform symptomatology according to the HiTOP model ( Kotov et al., 2017 ). Data from N = 619 persons from the German general population were analyzed. Results: Interoceptive attention showed significant positive relationships with all psychopathological traits ( r = .221 to r = .377), whereas interoceptive accuracy was negatively associated with internalizing symptomatology ( r = -.106). Conclusion: The present findings indicate that personal beliefs about interoceptive abilities have different influences on psychopathological developments.","PeriodicalId":46502,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract. Background: Only recently has interoception been discussed as a common risk factor for psychopathology. Recent approaches distinguish between the ability to accurately perceive ( interoceptive accuracy) and the propensity to attend ( interoceptive attention) to internal signals. Objective: To examine the latent structure of self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention and their relationships to psychopathology. Methods: We used a confirmatory factor analysis to clarify the latent structure of interoceptive accuracy and attention. Structural equation modeling was utilized to determine relationships between both abilities with internalizing and somatoform symptomatology according to the HiTOP model ( Kotov et al., 2017 ). Data from N = 619 persons from the German general population were analyzed. Results: Interoceptive attention showed significant positive relationships with all psychopathological traits ( r = .221 to r = .377), whereas interoceptive accuracy was negatively associated with internalizing symptomatology ( r = -.106). Conclusion: The present findings indicate that personal beliefs about interoceptive abilities have different influences on psychopathological developments.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自我报告的感觉准确性和注意力与心理病理学的差异关系

摘要背景：直到最近，交互感受才被讨论为精神病理学的一个常见风险因素。最近的方法区分了准确感知内部信号的能力（内感知准确性）和关注内部信号的倾向（内感知注意力）。目的：探讨自我报告的内感受准确性和注意力的潜在结构及其与精神病理学的关系。方法：我们采用验证性因素分析来阐明内感受准确性和注意力的潜在结构。根据HiTOP模型，利用结构方程建模来确定两种能力与内化和体型症状之间的关系（Kotov等人，2017）。对来自德国普通人群的N=619人的数据进行了分析。结果：感觉注意与所有精神病理学特征均呈显著正相关（r=.221～r=.377），而内感受准确性与内化症状学呈负相关（r=-0.106）。结论：目前的研究结果表明，个人对内感受能力的信念对精神病理学发展有不同的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs) zugleich Organ der Fachgruppen Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), der Sektion Klinische Psychologie im Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen (BDP), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verhaltenstherapie e.V. (DGVT), der Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Gesprächspsychotherapie e.V. (GWG), der Sektion Klinische Psychologie im Berufsverband Österreichischer Psychologinnen und Psychologen (B.Ö.P.) und der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für VerhaltensModifikation e.V. (AVM)