Review and recommendations for sustainable pathways of recycling commodity plastic waste across different economic regions

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Charles Darko , Plisylia Wong Shi Yung , Anlong Chen , Adolf Acquaye
{"title":"Review and recommendations for sustainable pathways of recycling commodity plastic waste across different economic regions","authors":"Charles Darko ,&nbsp;Plisylia Wong Shi Yung ,&nbsp;Anlong Chen ,&nbsp;Adolf Acquaye","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Commodity plastics such as polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are some of the common plastic wastes found in municipal wastes. Lack of technology, resources, coherent programs, policies, mismanagement and incomplete processing of these plastics, results in these plastics mostly ending up in landfills. Adopting a qualitative research approach, the paper reviewed PE, PP and PET recycling waste management processes from selected developed and developing countries. It was found that chemical recycling in terms of catalytic cracking followed by pyrolysis technologies are more suitable for producing higher liquid oils whiles gasification improves fuel gas yield. Given that mechanical recycling requires less capital and resources, it is a more suitable waste management option for plastic products in developing countries. In cases where there are complex separation issues, incineration for energy recovery is appropriate but it should be used with end-of-pipe treatment solutions to mitigate against the environmental impact of incineration. The paper further highlights various opportunities and challenges involved with PE, PP and PET plastic waste treatment pathway, the appropriate yields obtained for each technique and where adaptation can be made.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100134"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commodity plastics such as polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are some of the common plastic wastes found in municipal wastes. Lack of technology, resources, coherent programs, policies, mismanagement and incomplete processing of these plastics, results in these plastics mostly ending up in landfills. Adopting a qualitative research approach, the paper reviewed PE, PP and PET recycling waste management processes from selected developed and developing countries. It was found that chemical recycling in terms of catalytic cracking followed by pyrolysis technologies are more suitable for producing higher liquid oils whiles gasification improves fuel gas yield. Given that mechanical recycling requires less capital and resources, it is a more suitable waste management option for plastic products in developing countries. In cases where there are complex separation issues, incineration for energy recovery is appropriate but it should be used with end-of-pipe treatment solutions to mitigate against the environmental impact of incineration. The paper further highlights various opportunities and challenges involved with PE, PP and PET plastic waste treatment pathway, the appropriate yields obtained for each technique and where adaptation can be made.

Abstract Image

审查和建议在不同经济区域可持续回收商品塑料废物的途径
聚乙烯(PE)、聚丙烯(PP)和聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)等商品塑料是城市垃圾中常见的一些塑料废物。缺乏技术、资源、连贯的计划、政策、管理不善和对这些塑料的不完整处理,导致这些塑料大部分最终被填埋。本文采用定性研究方法,综述了选定的发达国家和发展中国家PE、PP和PET回收废物管理过程。研究发现,化学再循环催化裂化后再热解技术更适合生产高纯度的液态油,而气化技术可提高燃料气产率。鉴于机械回收需要较少的资金和资源,它是发展中国家塑料产品更合适的废物管理选择。在存在复杂分离问题的情况下,焚化以回收能源是适当的,但应与管道末端处理方案一起使用,以减轻焚化对环境的影响。本文进一步强调了PE, PP和PET塑料废物处理途径所涉及的各种机遇和挑战,每种技术获得的适当产量以及可以进行调整的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信