Coping strategies and emotional responses adopted by health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic-braving the storm.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shruti Sharma, Sarit Sharma, Paul Gunchan, Gautam Lal Parshotam, Namita Bansal, Gurwinder Singh, Arshdeep Kaur
{"title":"Coping strategies and emotional responses adopted by health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic-braving the storm.","authors":"Shruti Sharma, Sarit Sharma, Paul Gunchan, Gautam Lal Parshotam, Namita Bansal, Gurwinder Singh, Arshdeep Kaur","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_196_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Health care workers (HCWs) are caught in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic storm and are exposed to a large degree of physical and emotional stress. This study was planned to describe the stressors, stress levels, emotional responses, and coping strategies adopted by HCWs amidst this pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted after ethics approval, using a structured performa incorporating standardized stress (PSS-10 C), emotional responses (PANAS-10), and coping strategy (Brief COPE) scales. The snowball sampling technique was used to conduct the study and collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26 version (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. A <i>P</i> value of <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 402 participants (65% doctors and 35% nurses), 87% perceived moderate stress levels, and nearly half of the participants were interns, residents, and medical officers. Infection to self or family members (77.1%), survival of sick patients (75.6%), aggression by patients and relatives (70.3%), and long duty hours (67%) were some of the major stressors as reported by HCWs. The most common positive emotion felt was being alert (19.17 ± 5.57) and negative emotion perceived was being upset (15.6 ± 6.06). Many participants adopted emotion and problem-focused coping strategies such as planning and strategization (68%) and positive reframing (67.6%), whereas dysfunctional coping strategies such as venting and denial were adopted less commonly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate stress levels perceived by HCWs are a cause for concern. Emotional responses of HCWs to stress vary; however, appropriate coping strategies including emotional and problem-focused coping strategies are the need of the hour to tackle pandemic-related stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_196_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Health care workers (HCWs) are caught in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic storm and are exposed to a large degree of physical and emotional stress. This study was planned to describe the stressors, stress levels, emotional responses, and coping strategies adopted by HCWs amidst this pandemic.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted after ethics approval, using a structured performa incorporating standardized stress (PSS-10 C), emotional responses (PANAS-10), and coping strategy (Brief COPE) scales. The snowball sampling technique was used to conduct the study and collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26 version (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Out of 402 participants (65% doctors and 35% nurses), 87% perceived moderate stress levels, and nearly half of the participants were interns, residents, and medical officers. Infection to self or family members (77.1%), survival of sick patients (75.6%), aggression by patients and relatives (70.3%), and long duty hours (67%) were some of the major stressors as reported by HCWs. The most common positive emotion felt was being alert (19.17 ± 5.57) and negative emotion perceived was being upset (15.6 ± 6.06). Many participants adopted emotion and problem-focused coping strategies such as planning and strategization (68%) and positive reframing (67.6%), whereas dysfunctional coping strategies such as venting and denial were adopted less commonly.

Conclusion: Moderate stress levels perceived by HCWs are a cause for concern. Emotional responses of HCWs to stress vary; however, appropriate coping strategies including emotional and problem-focused coping strategies are the need of the hour to tackle pandemic-related stress.

新冠肺炎大流行期间医护人员采取的应对策略和情绪反应
背景和目的:医护人员(HCWs)身处 COVID-19 大流行风暴之中,面临着巨大的身体和精神压力。本研究计划描述医护人员在这一流行病中的压力源、压力水平、情绪反应以及所采取的应对策略:这项基于网络的横断面调查是在获得伦理批准后进行的,采用的结构化问卷包含标准化压力量表(PSS-10 C)、情绪反应量表(PANAS-10)和应对策略量表(Brief COPE)。研究采用滚雪球式抽样方法收集数据。数据使用 SPSS 26 版本(SPSS Inc.结果的 P 值为在 402 名参与者(65% 为医生,35% 为护士)中,87% 的人认为压力处于中等水平,近一半的参与者为实习生、住院医师和医务人员。感染自己或家人(77.1%)、病人的生存(75.6%)、病人和亲属的侵犯(70.3%)以及长时间值班(67%)是医护人员报告的一些主要压力源。最常见的积极情绪是警觉(19.17 ± 5.57),消极情绪是不安(15.6 ± 6.06)。许多参与者采用了以情绪和问题为中心的应对策略,如计划和策略化(68%)和积极重塑(67.6%),而功能失调的应对策略,如发泄和否认则较少采用:结论:医护人员感受到的适度压力值得关注。医护人员对压力的情绪反应各不相同;然而,当务之急是采取适当的应对策略,包括情绪和以问题为中心的应对策略,以应对与大流行相关的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信