Risk evaluation of adverse aortic events in patients with non-circular aortic annulus after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a numerical study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Jun Wen, Qi Gao, Jingnan Chen, Xinya Li, Kaiyue Zhang, Gang He, Min Dai, Pan Song
{"title":"Risk evaluation of adverse aortic events in patients with non-circular aortic annulus after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a numerical study","authors":"Jun Wen,&nbsp;Qi Gao,&nbsp;Jingnan Chen,&nbsp;Xinya Li,&nbsp;Kaiyue Zhang,&nbsp;Gang He,&nbsp;Min Dai,&nbsp;Pan Song","doi":"10.1007/s10237-023-01725-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a micro-invasive surgery used to treat patients with aortic stenosis (AS) efficiently. However, the uneven valve expansion can cause a non-circular annulus, which is one of the main factors leading to complications after TAVI. As a preliminary work, the main purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of adverse aortic events in patients with a non-circular aortic annulus after TAVI. This study numerically investigated the distribution of four wall shear stress (WSS)-based indicators and three helicity-based indicators in eight patient-specific aortas with different annulus including circular, type I elliptical and type II elliptical shapes. Both elliptical annulus features can significantly enhance the intensity of the helicity (<i>h</i>2) in the ascending aorta (<i>p</i>?&lt;?0.001). However, for the type I elliptical annulus, the spiral flow structure was changed into low-velocity and disturbed flow pattern close to the inner side of the aortic arch. For the type II elliptical annulus, the spiral flow remained but became skewed in distribution. The elliptical annulus feature could increase the general level WSS-based indicators, especially in the ascending aorta. However, due to the disturbance of spiral flow or second helical flow in ascending aortas, areas with low TAWSS accompanied by high oscillatory shear index (OSI) and cross flow index (CFI) were observed in all the ascending aortas with non-circular annulus. The elliptical annulus feature can change the hemodynamic environment in the aortic arch, especially in the ascending aorta. Although both elliptical annulus features enhanced the strength of helicity, the uniform distribution of the helical flow was disturbed, especially in the ascending aorta, indicating the potential risk of adverse aortic events may increase. Therefore, for the patients without paravalvular leak but elliptical annulus shape after TAVI treatment, surgeons may be needed to consider further dilatation to make the non-circular annulus become circular.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":"22 4","pages":"1379 - 1394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10237-023-01725-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a micro-invasive surgery used to treat patients with aortic stenosis (AS) efficiently. However, the uneven valve expansion can cause a non-circular annulus, which is one of the main factors leading to complications after TAVI. As a preliminary work, the main purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of adverse aortic events in patients with a non-circular aortic annulus after TAVI. This study numerically investigated the distribution of four wall shear stress (WSS)-based indicators and three helicity-based indicators in eight patient-specific aortas with different annulus including circular, type I elliptical and type II elliptical shapes. Both elliptical annulus features can significantly enhance the intensity of the helicity (h2) in the ascending aorta (p?<?0.001). However, for the type I elliptical annulus, the spiral flow structure was changed into low-velocity and disturbed flow pattern close to the inner side of the aortic arch. For the type II elliptical annulus, the spiral flow remained but became skewed in distribution. The elliptical annulus feature could increase the general level WSS-based indicators, especially in the ascending aorta. However, due to the disturbance of spiral flow or second helical flow in ascending aortas, areas with low TAWSS accompanied by high oscillatory shear index (OSI) and cross flow index (CFI) were observed in all the ascending aortas with non-circular annulus. The elliptical annulus feature can change the hemodynamic environment in the aortic arch, especially in the ascending aorta. Although both elliptical annulus features enhanced the strength of helicity, the uniform distribution of the helical flow was disturbed, especially in the ascending aorta, indicating the potential risk of adverse aortic events may increase. Therefore, for the patients without paravalvular leak but elliptical annulus shape after TAVI treatment, surgeons may be needed to consider further dilatation to make the non-circular annulus become circular.

Abstract Image

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后非环形主动脉环患者主动脉不良事件的风险评估:一项数值研究
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是一种用于治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的微创手术。然而,瓣膜扩张不均匀可造成非圆形环隙,这是导致TAVI术后并发症的主要因素之一。作为一项初步工作,本研究的主要目的是评估非圆形主动脉环患者在TAVI后发生不良主动脉事件的风险。本研究对8例不同环形、I型椭圆和II型椭圆的患者主动脉的4个壁剪应力指标和3个螺旋度指标的分布进行了数值研究。两种椭圆环特征均能显著增强升主动脉螺旋度(h2)的强度(p?<?0.001)。而对于I型椭圆环,螺旋流动结构转变为靠近主动脉弓内侧的低速扰动流动模式。对于II型椭圆环空,螺旋流仍然存在,但分布偏斜。椭圆环特征可提高wss指标的总体水平,尤其是升主动脉。然而,由于升主动脉螺旋流或二次螺旋流的干扰,所有非环状升主动脉均出现低TAWSS区,并伴有高振荡剪切指数(OSI)和横流指数(CFI)。椭圆环的特征可以改变主动脉弓内的血流动力学环境,尤其是升主动脉。虽然这两种椭圆环的特征都增强了螺旋度的强度,但螺旋流的均匀分布受到了干扰,尤其是在升主动脉,表明主动脉不良事件的潜在风险可能增加。因此,对于TAVI治疗后无瓣旁漏但环呈椭圆形的患者,外科医生可能需要考虑进一步扩张,使非圆形环变为圆形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信